Yes, entirely. Even when somebody tries to force you to do something, you make the final decision on whether you're going to comply or not. Mind control hasn't been discovered yet, and somebody else controlling your body is the only way you wouldn't be responsible, so yes, you are always responsible. Blaming your own actions on somebody else is just a defense mechanism to keep onesself from being punished. Your actions are based on a series of choices which you make and others can't make for you. They can only compel you to do certain things. Threatening somebody with death is only one way of convincing somebody to do something; it's not actually controlling them.
This view aligns with the perspective of existentialism, which emphasizes individual freedom and responsibility in shaping one's own actions and life choices. Existentialism asserts that individuals have the capacity to create their own meaning and determine their own path in the universe.
I determine my future through my actions, decisions, and mindset. While external factors may play a role, ultimately, I am responsible for shaping my own future.
Michael Gazzaniga concluded that the left hemisphere of the brain, which is responsible for language and communication, often constructs the theories or explanations that people offer to explain their own behaviors. This finding came from studying split-brain patients, who have had the connection between the two hemispheres of their brain severed.
Perceptions of actions are very biased. You know your own intentions, so you tend to view your actions in light of that. Also, you are present for the entirety of your actions. You do not know the intentions of others, so you only judge based on what you see, rather than what the other person was intending, or possibly actions that occurred which you may not be aware of.
Someone who doesn't care what other people think may be described as independent, self-assured, and confident in their own beliefs and actions. They are likely to prioritize their own values and opinions over seeking validation or approval from others.
obviously
An individual contributor is one who has done something on their own and not as a group. You are only responsible for your own actions versus managing a group of people.
they are responsible for their own tragedies because their actions cause them to die
they are responsible for their own tragedies because their actions cause them to die
The man with a hoe is responsible for his own condition. His circumstances are a result of his own actions, choices, and circumstances.
It is much easier and simpler to answer in the reverse manner:They ARE responsible for: directly - for their own actions and indirectly - for the official actions of their subordinates.
Individualism.
How can I answer my own question/
No. He is a legal adult and is responsible for his own actions, whether he lives with you or not.
Being responsible
It is NOT the government's concern. We as a people have to re-learn how to be responsible for our own actions. The government is not there to bail people out, although they often break the rules.
You tell you what to do in New Zealand. Much as with anywhere else, people are responsible for their own actions as well as inactions. If you helped to put a tyranical dictator in power, you are responsible for that. If you worked to depose a facist tyrant, you are responsible for that.