answersLogoWhite

0

Individuals who compromise their own ethics to obey authority in the Milgram Experiment can be held responsible for the treatment of another because they ultimately chose to follow orders that caused harm. Despite the pressure from authority figures, individuals have the free will to question and resist unethical commands. By choosing to prioritize authority over their own moral compass, they contribute to the mistreatment of others.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Psychology

Who conducted an experiment on the effects of punishment on learning that was in reality a classic experiment on obedience?

Stanley Milgram conducted an experiment on obedience, not punishment. The study, known as the Milgram experiment, aimed to understand the extent to which individuals would obey authority figures, even to the point of administering potentially harmful electric shocks to others.


What are milgrams views on the two assumptions bearing his experiment?

Milgram believed that individuals are willing to obey authority figures even when it conflicts with their own moral beliefs. He also thought that ordinary people are capable of committing harmful actions when instructed to do so by an authority figure.


What connections between the My Lai Massacre and Milgram's experiments?

In the experiment, a teacher was instructed by a scientist to administer electric shocks to a victim as part of a science experiment. Milgram's experiment showed how an expert or an authority figure can easily coerce humans into doing something which goes against their own judgement. This is exactly what made the My Lai Massacre happen.


What is the Milgram experiment?

The Milgram experiment was a series of social psychology experiments conducted by Yale University psychologist Stanley Milgram in the 1960s. The studies measured the willingness of individuals to obey authority figures who instructed them to perform acts conflicting with their personal conscience. The results demonstrated the power of situational factors in influencing behavior.


How do you write a hypothesis on milgram's experiment?

Stanley Milgram's experiment investigated the effect of authority on people's willingness to do unethical things, stemming from the experiences of the Holocaust. I think his hypothesis was that if people are pressured by a person of authority to do something, they will do it, even if it is against their moral code.

Related Questions

Who conducted an experiment on the effects of punishment on learning that was in reality a classic experiment on obedience?

Stanley Milgram conducted an experiment on obedience, not punishment. The study, known as the Milgram experiment, aimed to understand the extent to which individuals would obey authority figures, even to the point of administering potentially harmful electric shocks to others.


What central government authority is responsible for immigration in dominica?

Which central government authority is responsible for immigrant in Dominica


What is The theory of the Stanford Prison Experiment?

The theory of the Stanford Prison Experiment suggests that people's behavior can be significantly influenced by situational factors, such as being assigned a role of authority or submission. The study demonstrated how individuals in positions of power can abuse their authority when placed in a specific environment, highlighting the potential for role-playing to lead to extreme behavior.


What was the conclusion reached by Stanley Milgram in his teacher learner experiment?

Under orders, decent human beings will do anything. This experiment shows that people will obey authority figure even when there is no pre-existing relationship between the individual and the person of authority.


What individuals has expressed authority to enter into and administer contracts and is responsible for ensuring that contract actions comply with all laws executive orders and regulations?

Contracting officer


What are milgrams views on the two assumptions bearing his experiment?

Milgram believed that individuals are willing to obey authority figures even when it conflicts with their own moral beliefs. He also thought that ordinary people are capable of committing harmful actions when instructed to do so by an authority figure.


What connections between the My Lai Massacre and Milgram's experiments?

In the experiment, a teacher was instructed by a scientist to administer electric shocks to a victim as part of a science experiment. Milgram's experiment showed how an expert or an authority figure can easily coerce humans into doing something which goes against their own judgement. This is exactly what made the My Lai Massacre happen.


Who is responsible for erors when there is deligated authoritybordinate?

Each individual was responsible for errors when the are the delegated authority. There were many times that a person who was responsible for errors, took it upon themselves to correct them. They were deemed the authority.


Can the dvla lift a car cover?

The DVLA (driving and vehicle licensing authority) is responsible for issuance of licenses to individuals in UK. However, you need to be more specific about which cover are you talking about and in which context.


What is the name of the authority that is responsible for enforcing occupational health and safety?

The name of the authority that is responsible for enforcing occupational health and safety depends on what country, and what state or province, you are in.


What generalization is suggested by the Milgram experiment and the Stanford University prison experiment?

many people will uncritically follow the commands of those in authority.


What was unconstitutional about The Missouri Compromise What relationship did this unconstitutional compromise have to dred Scott's citizenship?

The Missouri Compromise was deemed unconstitutional because it violated the Fifth Amendment, which protects individuals from being deprived of property without due process. The compromise allowed Congress to regulate slavery in certain territories, effectively treating enslaved people as property. This relationship is highlighted in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case, where the Supreme Court ruled that Scott, an enslaved man, could not be a citizen and that Congress had no authority to prohibit slavery in the territories, thereby nullifying the Missouri Compromise.