Want this question answered?
In classical conditioning a stimulus that already leads to a response is replaced by a different stimulus. In operant conditioning a behaviour is picked out and either reinforced or punished to make it more or less common. So you could say one acts to modify or replace the stimulus that leads to a given response, and the other to modify or refine a response with SKELETONS. In terms of Pavlov's dog (classical) this meant replacing the smell of food, as the stimulus that leads to salivation, with the sound of a bell instead so that eventually even with the sound of the bell alone the dog has 'learned' to salivate. In terms of Skinner's cat (operant) the stimulus was confinement and the natural behaviour was to explore the environment for an escape. Teaching the cat to press the lever to get out can be seen as refining this behaviour with a reward. Here, of course, the cat was not shown how to press the lever. It discovered it randomly on it's own. But thereafter it did not waste much time before pressing the lever on the SKELETON.
No expert myself, but I would have to say yes.
Classical conditioning: Pavlov's dogs salivating at the sound of a bell after associating it with food. Operant conditioning: a rat pressing a lever to receive a food pellet, reinforcing the behavior.
In Ivan Pavlov's experiment, classical conditioning was demonstrated through the association of a neutral stimulus (bell) with a biologically significant stimulus (food), leading to the dog salivating in response to the bell alone. Over time, the neutral stimulus became a conditioned stimulus that elicited a conditioned response (salivation) similar to the unconditioned response to the food. This showed how pairing stimuli can lead to learned associations and behavioral changes.
Strengths of classical conditioning include its ability to explain how certain behaviors are learned through association and its practical application in behavior modification therapies. Limitations include the oversimplification of behavior as merely a result of stimulus-response connections and the failure to account for cognitive processes involved in learning.
Classical condition uses conditional and unconditional stimuli to draw out a certain response or behavior. Ivan Pavlov was the first to use this, and stumbled across it when doing research on the connection between dogs smelling meat and therefore salivating. He soon discovered that the dogs would salivate whenever the doctor that normally fed them would enter the room. Other research proved that in classical conditioning, an unconditional stimuli will produce a result whether it is Pavlov's dogs salivating or Watson's Baby Albert associating rats with fear.
Classical conditioning is a type of learning in which a neutral stimulus comes to elicit a reflexive response through association with a stimulus that already produces the response. The principles include the unconditioned stimulus (UCS), unconditioned response (UCR), conditioned stimulus (CS), and conditioned response (CR). Classical conditioning was famously demonstrated by Pavlov with his experiments involving dogs and salivation.
Classical conditioning is a learning process that occurs through associations between an environmental stimulus and a naturally occurring stimulus. In Pavlov's experiment the tone of a bell was the natural stimulus, and it caused salivating in response to food. Eventually the tone of the bell would produce salivating.
Classical Conditioning is also known as Pavlovian conditioning. It is when events( or stimulants) lead to a response. For example, watching a funny movie would cause you to laugh, just like a scary movie would make your heart beat faster. This is how the formation of fears and fobias are made. This is also how reflexive responses and scents that bring back certain memories are created.
In classical conditioning a stimulus that already leads to a response is replaced by a different stimulus. In operant conditioning a behaviour is picked out and either reinforced or punished to make it more or less common. So you could say one acts to modify or replace the stimulus that leads to a given response, and the other to modify or refine a response with SKELETONS. In terms of Pavlov's dog (classical) this meant replacing the smell of food, as the stimulus that leads to salivation, with the sound of a bell instead so that eventually even with the sound of the bell alone the dog has 'learned' to salivate. In terms of Skinner's cat (operant) the stimulus was confinement and the natural behaviour was to explore the environment for an escape. Teaching the cat to press the lever to get out can be seen as refining this behaviour with a reward. Here, of course, the cat was not shown how to press the lever. It discovered it randomly on it's own. But thereafter it did not waste much time before pressing the lever on the SKELETON.
No expert myself, but I would have to say yes.
Classical conditioning: Pavlov's dogs salivating at the sound of a bell after associating it with food. Operant conditioning: a rat pressing a lever to receive a food pellet, reinforcing the behavior.
If the child is a teen you're not going to be able to shape him into being a good choicemaker. A professional could help. With a younger child, it is easy. You find what he likes, and you remove it from him, or withhold it, when he doesn't perform the desired behavior. Answer People frequently mis-use the term "Classical Conditioning". The contributor above has described some of the basic elements of what is called "Operant Conditioning", and that is probably what you were asking about. You would not want to use Classical Conditioning on a child. I'm not sure that there would even be a way to do it that would give you results that you want. Classical Conditioning involves pairing an "unconditioned response", like salivation when given food, or the iris of the eye getting smaller when expose to stronger light, to a "conditioned stimulus", like the sounding of a bell. Think Pavlov. Repeatedly ring a bell just when you give food to a hungry dog. If you get the timing right, the dog will salivate when you ring the bell.
In Ivan Pavlov's experiment, classical conditioning was demonstrated through the association of a neutral stimulus (bell) with a biologically significant stimulus (food), leading to the dog salivating in response to the bell alone. Over time, the neutral stimulus became a conditioned stimulus that elicited a conditioned response (salivation) similar to the unconditioned response to the food. This showed how pairing stimuli can lead to learned associations and behavioral changes.
Some disadvantages of classical conditioning include the potential for creating negative associations or phobias, the reliance on external stimuli to trigger responses, and the limited applicability to complex human behaviors. Additionally, classical conditioning may not account for individual differences in learning and behavior.
Strengths of classical conditioning include its ability to explain how certain behaviors are learned through association and its practical application in behavior modification therapies. Limitations include the oversimplification of behavior as merely a result of stimulus-response connections and the failure to account for cognitive processes involved in learning.
classical conditioning