answersLogoWhite

0

This question is often posed as "Pascal's wager". It says that if one believes in God and in the afterlife and if there is really a God, the person will gain everything. if one doesn't believe in God and in the end there is God, the person will eventually loss everything, and if one believes in God and in the end there is no God, the person will not loss anything because one cannot lose something which he or she did not gain.

This, of course, depends on there being only two choices - no god, or my god. Of the several thousand gods worshipped throughout human history it is difficult to imagine a process to choose the "right" one. Even more difficult would be the process to imagine how to believe in this deity - does it require circumcision, blood sacrifices, or dietary conformity. Also one would have to hope the deity chosen offers some sort of eternal reward, not all of them do. Another consideration would be the consequences of choosing the wrong god. Some of them are pretty testy if you make a bad choice. Too bad if you are wrong!

The wagers results then become:

1. If you choose a god with an associated afterlife and he/she/it exists and cares anything about you (another question) and you are right in your choice you may get your "reward" if you haven't ticked him off by not following all the rules or by just believing in he/she/it to get a reward. Note that not all afterlife's are pleasant even for the "good".

2. In the same case as above and you choose to ignore this god/afterlife package you probably wind up in a comparable situation - maybe a bit worse, maybe a bit better.

3. If there is no god, no afterlife, no continuation and you wasted your time mutilating yourself and your kids, eating a restricted diet or giving your time and money to a ragtag bunch of shaman's you've missed a lot in this life - the only one you've got.

4. If case 3 is true and you live a normal life with no effort made to believe in any god or follow any "divine" rules - you win.

So all in all it seems that it is better for a person to be an atheist.

AdditionAlthough I am an atheist I think it would be better to believe in a god (that is if you could bring yourself to believe in one unlike me). There is no proof for or against the existence of a god and if you really wanted maximum benefit it would be have faith but don't waste your time with religion. Therefore you don't waste any time and are theoretically have a chance at an afterlife, however unlikely that my be.

Answer 3

I'm also atheist, but I feel that there is no "better" answer here. The question is, what do you feel comfortable following? If a particular religious tradition helps you make sense of the world, connect with your fellow human beings and motivates you in a positive way to become a better, more caring human being, that religion is probably the best choice for you. If a particular religious tradition makes you feel unworthy or fearful, motivates you to treat others as less than yourself (such as for not being saved as you are) or doesn't help you understand and relate to the world and your life within it, that religion is probably not a good place for you to be. If no religions help you, then maybe Humanism, agnosticism or Atheism would be best for you.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?