Yes, the practice of total war by individuals or small, poorly armed groups differs significantly from that of nations and standing armies. While nations typically have organized military strategies, resources, and infrastructure to conduct total war, individuals or small groups often resort to guerrilla tactics and asymmetric warfare. Their approach may focus on targeting civilian infrastructure or using psychological warfare to disrupt and demoralize the enemy, rather than engaging in conventional battles. Moreover, the ethical and legal implications of total war can vary significantly between state and non-state actors, affecting accountability and the perception of legitimacy in their actions.
what happens when different cultures are interdependent?
Imperialism is the practice of taking control of weaker nations.
Militarism
The Nations that broke away from the Soviet Union now practice a gosdjs
What sorts of long standing disputes exist today in communities and nations?
Had no standing army and no real power to enforce its decrees
Yes. Saudi Arabia is a member of the United Nations. It was admitted on October 24, 1945 and remains in good-standing.
Developing countries are primarily different from industrial nations in that the living standards are not the same
It is isolationism.
The League of Nations failed because it did not have total membership, withdrawal was easy, it's Security Council was a law unto itself, it did not have a standing army... It was replaced with the United Nations.
i think yes
No, they can certainly sanction the s*** out of nations who do not practice it though.