Some sects of Islam may require it, others may not. There may be unwritten requirements depending on where you live or where you are visiting. Whether or not it is a good thing is up to you; from a secular point of view it is neither good nor bad. It is a matter of choice and personal conviction.
During the recent events in Nairobi Kenya, it was reported that a woman and her daughter were told to recite passages from the Koran, which they did, and then were shot dead by the terrorists because they were not wearing the hajaab. This was done while the son of the woman watched. It is hard to imagine a more hideous act of cowardice and terrorism. This by people who claim devotion to a religion that teaches 'There is no compulsion in religion'. This very clearly shows the difference between religion itself, and vile people who try to use religion in order to justify their own sick agenda.
Yes, it is.
Japan was the first Country banned the Hijab
The preposition is of.The prepositional phrase is: of his skateboard.
Kimono is from Japanese meaning ki=wearing mono=thing there for kimono translates to wearing thing
No because if you go out side while wearing something shiny it will peck you and try to take the shiny thing
The garment in question is called an abaya. It is combination of the hijaab (which covers a woman's hair) and a niqab (which covers a woman's mouth).
you get to eat in class text n other stuff u dont get to do @ school XD
Just tell her it smells really good and ask her what she's wearing.
Wearing hijabs is not a 'bad thing' in France and is not forbidden. What is forbidden is wearing a full-face veil designed to obscure completely all parts of the face, such as the Niqaab or the Burkah. (see related question)
First, wearing a purse is not a gay thing do do. Second, the difference between a bag and a purse is purely semantics.
No. The common headscarf is called a hijaab. The hijaab covers only hair allowing the entire face to be visible. A burqa is used in some parts of Central Asia and has a mesh covering over the face so that the woman is unidentifiable.
No