settlement of freedmen in Africa
Both Quakers and slaveholders supported the institution of slavery at different points in history, though their motivations and eventual stances diverged significantly. Early Quakers, particularly in the 17th century, participated in the slave trade and owned slaves, driven by economic interests. However, by the late 18th century, many Quakers became prominent abolitionists, advocating for the end of slavery on moral and ethical grounds. In contrast, slaveholders continued to defend and uphold the institution of slavery for economic and social reasons throughout the 19th century.
Settlement of freedmen in Africa.
settlement of freedmen in Africa
Quakers did not believe in war.
They didn't
Slaveholders opposed the Wilmot Proviso because Slaveholders argued that slaves were property by the Constitution
because they hated blacks like most southerners still do today.. end of story.
Slaveholders supported the settlement of freed slaves in Africa because they believed it would help maintain the racial hierarchy and remove potential sources of rebellion within the United States. Additionally, some slaveholders thought it would be a way to rid themselves of free blacks who were seen as a threat to the institution of slavery.
They were strongly opposed to violence and war.
quakers mostly
Slaveholders supported the settlement of freed slaves in Africa because they feared social and economic disruptions caused by emancipation in the United States. They believed that by resettling freed slaves in Africa, they could maintain control and avoid potential conflicts with newly freed individuals. Additionally, some slaveholders saw it as a way to fulfill their moral responsibility to provide assistance to freed slaves.
needed their political support