First, we should clarify that there are two types of jihad. Greater Jihad, which is an introspective journey to conquer your internal demons and follow the Divine Laws more closely than previously, is a practice to promote a person's piety. Lesser Jihad is usually brought to life in the form of warfare between Muslims and Non-Muslims or other Muslims, but can also be expressed in non-violent protest or debate.
Muslims are quick to point out that the attacking of civilians is a violation of the terms of a Lesser Jihad, but there are serious debates in the Islamic communities worldwide as to what a "civilian" is. A number of leading Sheikhs, including Egypt's Qaradawi, for example, have held that since almost all Israelis are drafted in the Israeli Defense Forces, there is no civilian population in Israel and targeting Israeli non-combatants is NOT a violation of the jihad requirements to avoid civilian deaths. Bin Laden and his ilk have expanded these rulings to say that all people in a democracy publicly vote on the government and are, therefore, responsible for its decisions. In that way, targeting the non-combatants in a democracy would NOT be a violation of the jihad requirements to avoid civilian deaths. Muslims who follow these perspectives are willing to perform violent acts against civilians. In most cases, these civilians are Non-Muslims.
One particularly recent example of Non-Muslims killed in a declared jihad are the Assyrian Christians and Yazidis being hunted down by ISIL in northern Iraq. Whether ISIL is properly within the terms of a Lesser Jihad when it performs these activities is hotly debated in Islamic circles, but it is incorrect to say that Non-Muslims are not being killed as a result of something that is, at least facially, a jihad. Other examples include the Palestinian Intifadas which primarily targeted Jewish Israeli civiians, the Mumbai bombing which targeted primarily Hindu Indian civilians, etc.
Note: This answer is confusing because of double-negatives and exclusion of people groups who cannot ever be combatants, such as Arabs married to Americans/Israelis, blind Israelis, unborn children inside the womb of a non-Muslim, people who have no arms, tourists.
Crusade or Jihad.
The meanings of jihad and crusade have evolved significantly since the 11th century. In the 11th century, jihad primarily referred to a struggle or effort in the name of Islam, which could be spiritual, moral, or military, while crusades were military campaigns initiated by Christians to reclaim the Holy Land. Today, jihad is often associated with a broader range of meanings, including personal spiritual struggle, and can sometimes be co-opted for militant agendas. Similarly, the term crusade has taken on a more metaphorical meaning, often used to describe any vigorous campaign for a cause, losing much of its original religious and military connotation.
Jihad-crusade
Every concept, or word for a concept, has two meanings: what the user wishes it to mean and what it means to the listener, based on his or her experience. Jihad means "struggle" and some wish to use it to mean "interior effort to reach self-perfection" kind of struggle. Many people however heard it to mean "holy war" based on the number of Muslims who have committed atrocities while claiming they were on jihad (the Arabic word for "jihad-ers" is "mujahideen"). Some Muslims wish "jihad" to mean the latter (i.e., killing people). Others think Western interpretation of this sort is unfair to them. It's something of a problem to say which version is "correct" without being able to read the speaker's mind. A perfectly analogous situation surrounds the word "crusade": to a Westerner, "crusade" means a dedicated effort to correct something, as in "Crusade against Illiteracy" or "Crusade for Clean Water." To Muslims, however, the term only means "military action against Muslims."
In Western culture, "jihad" is often misrepresented primarily as synonymous with violent extremism or terrorism, overshadowing its broader meanings in Islamic tradition. While jihad literally translates to "struggle" or "striving," it encompasses both spiritual and personal efforts toward self-improvement and ethical conduct in addition to any martial aspect. This reductionist view ignores the rich theological and historical contexts of jihad, leading to misconceptions that fuel stereotypes and misunderstandings about Islam and its followers. As a result, the nuanced and multifaceted nature of jihad is frequently lost in public discourse.
Answer 1Jihad refers to fighting the enemy.Jihad cannot change meaning,it always used to refer to fighting the enemy and will still refer to fighting the enemy.Answer 2There are a wide number of definitions for what jihad means. It refers to struggle or striving and can be applied to situations as innocuous as exercising (a jihad against laziness) or situations as violent as offensive warfare (a jihad against the unbelievers). This is because the term is open to numerous interpretations and meanings and jurisprudential applications.
Yes, Jihad is used as male name. Jihad is an Arabic word that means struggle. Answer 2 No Jihad is not a name ,Mujahid (the person who does jihad) is a name for a male. Mujahida is for a female.
I think it is meaning of words
Insufficient information; this symbol has many meanings.
Log on means to go online, log in means to sign in. So, both are correct, but they have different meanings
The Jihad Movement was a uniting force for Muslims. Jihad means fighting for Islam.And it was Successful.
Jihad is an ongoing phenomenon. It has not ended.