Pilate allowed the Jewish court elders to make a decision regarding Jesus' execution primarily to appease the local religious authorities and the crowd, as he sought to maintain peace and avoid unrest during Passover. By deferring to the Sanhedrin, Pilate aimed to distance himself from the political ramifications of executing Jesus, whom he found to be innocent. Ultimately, he was caught between his own legal judgments and the pressure from the Jewish leaders and the mob, leading him to wash his hands of the decision.
Only a roman ruler could legally order an execution, which is what the Jewish leaders wanted.
Pontius Pilate wanted the Jewish authorities to judge Jesus to avoid direct responsibility for the decision regarding Jesus' fate. By handing the matter over to the Jewish Sanhedrin, Pilate sought to placate the local populace and maintain peace during the Passover festival, a time of heightened tensions. Additionally, he may have perceived the charges against Jesus as a religious matter rather than a political one, thus hoping to shift the burden onto the Jewish leaders. Ultimately, this maneuver reflected Pilate's desire to navigate the complex political landscape of Judea while minimizing his own risk.
Pilate asked Jesus, "What is truth?"
The temple demanded the execution; the crucifixion was carried out by Pontius Pilate.
Pilate yielded to the demands of the Jewish crowd primarily to maintain order and avoid a potential uprising, as the region was already tense with unrest. He sought to appease the crowd by releasing Barabbas instead of Jesus, believing this would satisfy them and prevent further violence. Additionally, Pilate's reluctance to become embroiled in a religious conflict and his desire to protect his political position influenced his decision to capitulate to the crowd's wishes.
Pontius Pilate's gesture of washing his hands may symbolize his attempt to distance himself from responsibility for Jesus' crucifixion, but ultimately it does not absolve him of accountability in moral or historical terms. Pilate, as governor, had the authority to prevent Jesus' execution and failed to do so despite knowing of His innocence. His decision reflects his prioritization of political expediency over justice.
Pontius Pilate was a Roman and a pagan, hated by the Jews.
He was put on trial by the Romans. But the Jews wanted it.
Caiaphas was High Priest. Jesus was sentenced to death on the orders of Pilate, the Roman Governor because the Jewish leaders had no authority to do so. The Pharisees and priests, as a committee, urged Pilate to condemn Jesus.
After speaking with Jesus, Pilate could not find any wrong in Him: John 18:38New International Version (NIV) 38 "What is truth?" retorted Pilate. With this he went out again to the Jews gathered there and said, "I find no basis for a charge against him.
Yes they did. The Romans were responsible for Our Lord's Crucifixion.
Historically and Biblically, this question can be very hard to . It is my opinion that the trial of Jesus never happen, and the death of Jesus cannot be blamed on the Pharisses or Pontius Pilate. Neither one killed Jesus. Jesus was predestined by God to die on the cross, and God used the Pharisses, Pontius Pilate and Judas to accomplish this.