You might use as evidence such things as human suffering, or evolution. Neither of these disprove God, but some people may think that they do.See also:
A secular worldview typically approaches the question of God's existence from a rational and evidence-based perspective, often relying on scientific explanations and empirical evidence to understand the world. In the absence of empirical evidence for the existence of God, a secular worldview generally leans towards skepticism or atheism. This perspective emphasizes the importance of critical thinking, logic, and empirical evidence in forming beliefs about the existence of supernatural entities like God.
The term "atheist" refers to a person who does not believe in the existence of gods or deities. Atheists typically rely on reason, science, and empirical evidence to form their beliefs about the world.
Agnosticism is the belief that it is impossible to know whether God exists. Agnostics neither affirm nor deny the existence of a deity due to lack of evidence or the limitations of human knowledge. This stance contrasts with atheism, which denies the existence of God, and theism, which affirms belief in a deity.
People are often drawn to religion for a sense of community, purpose, comfort, and hope. Faith provides a framework for understanding the world and coping with life's challenges, even in the absence of concrete evidence. Additionally, spiritual experiences and personal beliefs can be deeply meaningful to individuals, influencing their belief in a higher power.
AnswerBlaise Pascal claimed to prove that belief in God is rational with the argument, "If God does not exist, one will lose nothing by believing in him, while if he does exist, one will lose everything by not believing. We are compelled to gamble."
We do not need evidence that gods do not exist. We don't need to prove a negative. The claim there is no proof that gods do not exist is part of a fallacious argument used by some believers to balance out the lack of any evidence that gods doexist. Try not to get confused about that issue.Regarding the issue of evidence of the existence of God, please see the related question.
I am a living evidence for the existence of God. If you know me, you will understand. I am surrounded by lot of negative forces (spirits). I am scolding them daily. I think most of the people or almost all people are hearing my voices as well as evil spirits’ voices everyday. At present all creatures including human beings are living in a miraculous era of God. This is a temporary miracle of God. I am connected to all creatures including human beings and spirits internally by God since year 1950 but I am not a God. I think that all human beings can see what I see, can hear what I hear and even know my thoughts. But thoughts are complicated matter. It needs an explanation. The people who have born in this era cannot realize this miracle because they have born with it. An old brave and honest gentleman aged 85 can explain about this miracle.
there is no evidence that proves or disproves the existence of god, so asserting that a god or gods exist or don't exist is a waste of time due to a lack of evidence for both sides.
Heaven only exists if there is a God, who can ordain rewards for those who believe in him, and perhaps also for those who do good deeds. Apart from the lack of any evidence for the existence of God, there is no evidence for the existence of heaven.We are told heaven exists, because the longing for a blissful afterlife is often sufficient to maintain the loyalty and obedience of churchgoers.
God made the first people, who were the ancestors of everyone, including atheists. We have free-will, which God gave us and can even be used to deny Him.See also:Is there evidence for Creation?Can you show that God exists?Seeing God's wisdom
Applying the scientific method, it is unverifiable, but evidence points to "no". Ghosts are about as likely to exist as the tooth fairy, Santa, or God.
Linguistic Evidence
Atheism is real and functioning, so in all respects one would certainly consider it alive. As there has never been any substantial evidence for any god, if the choices are 'alive' or 'dead' then one could consider God to be dead, if that is your choice.However with no evidence to provide God does not exist, then one can equally consider the opposite that God is very much alive.
There is a lot of evidence that they do, indeed, exist.
A secular worldview typically approaches the question of God's existence from a rational and evidence-based perspective, often relying on scientific explanations and empirical evidence to understand the world. In the absence of empirical evidence for the existence of God, a secular worldview generally leans towards skepticism or atheism. This perspective emphasizes the importance of critical thinking, logic, and empirical evidence in forming beliefs about the existence of supernatural entities like God.
If a father (God) doesn't exist, then no son can exist.
An atheist is one who doesn't believe in a god or gods. Note that this is not necessarily equivalent to the claim that a god (or gods) exist; for many atheists, it's more like doubting that a god exists, until sufficient evidence is provided.