The difference between felony and misdemeanor probation is the felony is when a person is sentence to a jail term, but it can be served out of jail. The misdemeanor probation is not given jail time. They serve a probation period.
As long as you are advised of your Miranda rights beforequestioning is begun it does not matter. Miranda rights are not about being arrested they are about what your rights are during questioning.
It depends upon the wording of the statute in your paarticular jurisdiction. In some states it is a misdemeanor and in others it is a felony, in still others it can depend on how much resistance was given to the officer and can range from a misdemeanor charge up to a felony.
When the police took the suspect into custody, they read him his Miranda rights. The Miranda rights are the national precedent for reminding a suspect of her rights. The supreme court's decision in Miranda v. Arizona led to the adoption of the Miranda rights.
A felony is a serious crime in the United States and previously other common law countries. A felony is one of several grave crimes, such as murder, rape, or burglary, punishable by a more stringent sentence than that given for a misdemeanor. Another word for it is crime.
Having it expunged doesn't restore your firearms rights - you remain a convicted felon, and thus, are prohibited from possessing a firearm under federal law. If it is only a felony at the state level, it MIGHT be possible to have your firearms rights restored. You'll need a lawyer to give you a more insightful answer here. If it's a federal felony, you can pretty much forget it.
When a person is convicted of a felony in the state of Missouri, they lose many rights that are given to people that are not felons. Examples of rights that are lost include the right to vote, and the right to be in possession of a fire arm.
The state in question is not given, therefore it is impossible to answer the question. Different states codify their law differently.
Miranda stated he didn't know his rights that are given in the 14th amendment, so the Supreme Court found that the police need to inform a person of their rights when they are arrested. Hence, the Miranda decision.
Maybe.
Police have to read you the Miranda rights if they are planning to use what you say in court against you. Generally this happens when you are taken into custody. Exactly how early they have to read them to you varies.
A summons is syaing that charges are being filed because of probable cause of a complaint. Lw enforcement only needs to read you your rights (Miranda v. Arizona) if you are: 1) Under arrest; or in a police controlled environment 2) You are asked questions which would cause you to incriminate yourself