No. Technically they don't have to be given at all. Law enforcement agencies do it just so that no one can possibly say "I didn't know"; they're arguably so ubiquitous in mass media that even people in other countries could be reasonably expected to already know them.
As long as you are advised of your Miranda rights beforequestioning is begun it does not matter. Miranda rights are not about being arrested they are about what your rights are during questioning.
When the police took the suspect into custody, they read him his Miranda rights. The Miranda rights are the national precedent for reminding a suspect of her rights. The supreme court's decision in Miranda v. Arizona led to the adoption of the Miranda rights.
Police do not need to read you your Miranda rights if they do not plan to question the suspect. If they do not plan to use anything the suspect says in court (usually if they already have enough evidence) then they might not read him/her the rights.
It seems to be used this way: Miranda warning, or Miranda rights. Miranda is capitalized because it is the last name of the defendant who sued to bring these rights into law.
Miranda stated he didn't know his rights that are given in the 14th amendment, so the Supreme Court found that the police need to inform a person of their rights when they are arrested. Hence, the Miranda decision.
Maybe.
Police have to read you the Miranda rights if they are planning to use what you say in court against you. Generally this happens when you are taken into custody. Exactly how early they have to read them to you varies.
The miranda rights is a verbal warning given to you by a law enforcer wich states you have the right to remain silent,you have the right to consult with a lawyer before speaking to the police, if you cant afford an attorney one will be provided for you.
The Miranda rights were not vetoed. They are in use today. They come from the amendments to the Constitution.
No, Miranda rights are specific to the United States only. Even if you have similar rights in another country, it is incorrect to call them "Miranda rights." The name "Miranda rights" comes from the US Supreme Court case "Miranda v. Arizona" which established that a person being questioned by the police must be advised of his or her right to have an attorney present, and of certain other rights.
Miranda v. Arizona
The Miranda rights themselves are a part of the amendments to the Constitution. They became "the Miranda rights" and it was required that they be read to suspects in 1966. This was decided in the supreme court case Miranda v. Arizona.