0
Opinion: No. The inference is not for inferiority. In practice, however, for example in racially-separate public schools, some schools were treated differently resulting in fewer high quality graduates.
Opinion: Yes, it can when set in motion but is not always the case.
For example, most public places around the US have separate restrooms for the men and women. It isn't to imply women are inferior to men or vice versa, but to protect the privacy of the different but equal genders.
However, when separating people by color, class, or likewise, it can be easier to see implied inferiority because of access to certain necessities the other side usually does not have.
With men and women, normally, both have running water and fully working Plumbing within their restroom, give or take a few places with bad upkeep.
But with race, normally, one side's access to the proper tools and equipment to achieve their potential or get the best out of life is severely slanted or not in place at all.
Many reasons can be stated why such a thing would happen, but one of the most logical is that "their" side is seen as inferior and not worthy enough of what the "other side" has, so it simply is not given.
In that case, inferiority is indeed implied, and that would be especially easy for a person to see if they are on the so seen as "inferior" side.
What else can I help you with?
How did the Supreme Court justify the practice of segregating railroad passengers in Louisiana by race?
The Supreme Court justified the practice of segregating railroad passengers in Louisiana by race in the 1896 case Plessy v. Ferguson by upholding the "separate but equal" doctrine. The Court ruled that racial segregation was constitutional as long as the separate facilities for the races were equal. The majority opinion, written by Justice Henry Billings Brown, argued that the law did not imply the inferiority of either race and that social equality could not be legislated. This decision effectively sanctioned racial segregation and discrimination in various aspects of public life.
What is an individual who disagrees or has a difference of opinion called?
Words with this meaning tend to suggest someone who disagrees or has a difference of opinion with the majority. Dissident or dissenter are the best match; heretic or apostate may apply if the opinion is an established religious one; rebel or traitor imply joining another side where there is a violent dispute or war involved. Words like cynic and skeptic imply someone who does not share your opinion but may not have a fully-formed opinion of their own.
What else does equiangular imply about a triangle?
An equiangular triangle is an equilateral triangle that has 3 equal interior angles and 3 equal sides.
What do these numbers imply for the decision of when to open a shared facility versus two separate facilities?
We can not answer your question because you have not told us what "these numbers" are.
What shape has equal angles?
Any regular shaped polygon has equal angles and equal sides
10.50 equals what decimal?
It equals 10.50! It could equal 10.5 but that would imply a lower degree of precision.
Does more information mean relevant for good decision making?
The quantity of information and the relevance of information are two separate factors. One does not imply the other.
What is the difference between congruence and equality?
Numbers are equal, figures are congruent. If you said that two shapes are equal, you imply that they are the same shape. This is why we use congruence, because it says they are the same shape but distinct.
What is a sentence with imply?
His demeanor seemed to imply the worst. I would not imply that.
What does the term breakup mean?
It depends on what type of breakup you mean to say. A breakup could imply the dissolution of a relationship, or it could mean to divide a country into separate parts.
What does gender equality imply?
Gender equality is the measurable equal presence of males and females. The implication is that there is still sexual inequality and sexual discrimination in our world.
Hacker and kracker their different and similarity?
A hacker is a person who is ambitious and creative with what he does, looking for the shortest solution, with the opinion that information should be shared. He is helpful and lazy at the same time, and proud of his laziness. It does not imply that a hacker needs to be a programmer. A cracker is someone cracking any kind of security system. It does not imply whether he is a hacker or not.
