The structural functionalist approach views society as a stable system composed of interrelated parts, where the family is seen as a fundamental institution that contributes to social order and stability by fulfilling essential functions like socialization and emotional support. In contrast, conflict and feminist approaches highlight the power dynamics and inequalities within society and families, emphasizing how issues like patriarchy, economic disparity, and social injustice shape family structures and roles. While structural functionalism tends to focus on consensus and harmony, conflict and feminist perspectives critique the status quo and advocate for social change to address systemic inequalities. Together, these approaches offer a comprehensive understanding of family dynamics within the broader societal context.
Both the structural-functionalism and social conflict approaches offer valuable insights into social stratification. Structural-functionalism emphasizes how social systems work together to maintain stability and order, while social conflict theory highlights how power dynamics and inequalities contribute to stratification. The choice between the two approaches depends on the specific context being studied and the level of analysis being considered.
The dominant approach in the sociological study of social problems today is the structural functionalist perspective. This approach emphasizes how society as a whole functions, the interrelationships between social institutions, and how social problems may arise from dysfunction or imbalance in these structures.
The conflict perspective criticizes the functionalist approach for overlooking the power dynamics and inequalities that drive social change. Conflict theorists argue that focusing only on the functional aspects of society ignores the need for social change to address systemic injustices and power imbalances.
U hav 2 8 research by yourself
The conflict perspective reflects a macro-level approach, focusing on how inequality and power imbalances within society contribute to conflicts between different groups. This perspective views society as a system where conflict is inevitable due to competition over resources and power. By analyzing these structural forces, the conflict perspective seeks to understand the underlying reasons for conflict within society.
The social-conflict approach is a framework for buildingtheory that sees society as an arena of inequality that generatesconflict and change.
Critics argue that the structural functional approach oversimplifies social structures, ignores power dynamics, and places too much emphasis on stability and consensus in society. It is also criticized for not adequately addressing social change, conflict, and inequality within societies. Additionally, some scholars believe that this approach tends to reinforce the status quo and uphold dominant power structures.
Approach approach conflict is a conflict where you feel like getting this as well as that. Example: Got accepted to the top two colleges but you have to decide which one to go.Got two nice jobs but have to go to one.
Structural conflict theory suggests that conflict arises from inequalities in society's institutions and structures, leading to competition for resources and power among different groups. It focuses on how these structural imbalances create and perpetuate conflict and social issues.
Race- conflict approach, a point of view that focuses on inequality and conflict between people of different racial and ethnic categories.
Race- conflict approach, a point of view that focuses on inequality and conflict between people of different racial and ethnic categories.
C. Symbolic interactionist perspective explains the relativity of deviance by emphasizing how individuals construct meanings and interpretations of behaviors through social interactions. This perspective focuses on the subjective nature of deviance and how it is defined and labeled within specific cultural contexts.