violent protest is like the suffragettes they used violence to get what they wanted and nonviolent is where you use powers of persuasion to get your way and not to use violence.
Iran in 1979
dorothy the dinosaur
Islam and quran both are against use violence in any action where violence could have been substituted for non-violent actions there really isn't a better or worse to either one, they are both protests and, according to history, both usually end with getting what they were about.
He stopped eating.
Because of boycott and violent protests by colonists
Paris.
he made speeches and participated in non-violent protests.
The disadvantages of a non-violent protest consists of verbal abuse used more commonly as physical violence is not tolerated in non-violent protests.
Drafting
ghandi
No they don't, because then they wouldn't get any where.