cross cutting relationship
Yes
That depends! If the fault line cross cuts the igneous intrusion causing the intrusion to be displaced on either side of the fault and forming a broken mass of rock within the intrusion known as a fault breccia then the fault is younger than the intrusions, as the intrusion must have already existed for the fault to cause it's displacement. If on the other hand the igneous intrusion cross cuts the fault and is un-deformed then it is probable that it is younger than the fault.
One is not necessarily older than the other. It depends on the context. A fault running through any rock must be younger than that rock.
well love is a boy and a girl together ...........like meh3>
California, Nevada, and Oregon are no fault states. If you need a complete list of all the fifty states that are no fault or driver fault states you can ask an insurance agent.
No fault divorce is available in all 50 states in the United States.
In a reverse fault the maximum principal stress is horizontal, compression causes reverse (thrust) faults.
To determine whether the fault is older or younger than rock layer A, we can use the principle of cross-cutting relationships. If the fault cuts through rock layer A, it is younger than that layer, as it must have formed after the rock was deposited. Conversely, if rock layer A is found to be disrupted by the fault, then the fault is older. Therefore, examining the relationship between the fault and rock layer A is key to establishing their relative ages.
No fault divorce is allowed in all 50 states in the United States.
older because it is at the bottom and the ones on top are younger than the bottoms
This statement refers to Steno's Principle of Superposition, which states that in an undisturbed sequence of rock layers, the youngest layer is on top and the oldest is on the bottom. Therefore, any fault or intrusion cutting through these layers must be younger than the rock it is cutting through.
No fault divorce laws are in effect in all 50 states in the United States.