0
What else can I help you with?
What do you think might happen if there were no limits on the civil liberties?
somthing will happen If there were no limits on civil liberties, people would have more freedom. People would still feel constrained from certain activities due to societal pressure and cultural norms.
What would happen if there were no limits on civil liberties?
The term 'civil liberties' doesn't allow for a 'no limits' option. The term 'civil' tells us the liberties referred to are of paramount importance to the community and their scope is limited to, or decided by, the community in question. For a soft example, in some communities it is fine to go out with no head-covering; in others it isn't. That's easy to follow and harms nobody. In some communities, for a hard example, it is fine for family members to beat or kill men, women and children for perceived infringements of family or cultural rules; this is an infringement of the injured parties liberties. A total lack of limits on the liberty of any citizen to do whatever they liked at any given moment for any reason or no reason at all would result in anarchy. Anarchy is a situation where no governmental or social controls exist. In an anarchical situation any sense of community or personal responsibility does not exist and no personal responsibility is taken for any actions against members of the community involved. In a fairly short time that community will cease to exist, without survivors, or with very, very few. This has been shown for many decades by researchers. In any civil society the community must be continually aware the notion of civil liberty is a vital part of their existence. Once one accepts the notion liberties accorded to some might not apply to others one accepts that civil liberties apply only to oneself. This concept isn't anarchy, but it does erode the humanity of every single member of that community, regardless of their status within that community. So, we must retain a concious awareness of the rights of every single person to enjoy the liberty life should allow them. As the American Declaration of Independence demanded, every human owns the inalienable right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. When we seek, as we continually do, to ensure this is the right of every person, we are seeking enforcement of civil liberties. By definition, we cannot possibly seek a 'no limits' situation on this because that might easily deny the civil liberties of others. Civil liberties have no limits, but they come with built-in respect for the civil liberties of every other human in our global or local community.
What is just as important as your civil liberties?
In a legal sense, a person's civil liberties, cover all a person's rights in any situation. For example, an ill person arriving at a hospital's emergency room, under law, must be treated whether they have health insurance or not. One might believe that "health" is outside the realm of civil liberties, however, that's incorrect. Thus under law, a person has a civil liberty to receive medical care for an emergency situation. This is a simple example. There are many others can be cited.
What did john Locke say might happen to the state of nature?
John Locke proposed that in the state of nature, individuals might face a lack of security and protection of their natural rights, leading to conflict and potential harm. To avoid this, Locke argued for the establishment of civil society and a social contract to protect people's liberties and property.
Will a discrimination lawyer work pro bono?
"Some discrimination attorneys will do pro bono work. To find one, one might check with a civil rights organization such as the American Civil Liberties Union or the NAACP."
Basic argument for restricting civil liberties during war?
During times of conflict and change civil liberties are challenged. Societal views and values do not change as easily as political belief, and people hold on to the views they were previously taught.
Was lincolns justified in his violations of ordinary civil liberties during the Civil war?
Most people would agree that he did the right thing in jailing certain leaders in Maryland who might have driven that state into the arms of the Confederates. If Maryland and the other 'buffer-states' had joined the Confederacy, the outcome might have been very different.
What would happen if the US presidential elections were postponed?
I don't know. They are never supposed to be canceled according to the constitution. If they are canceled there might be a revolution or civil war.
When was Something Might Happen created?
Something Might Happen was created in 2003.
What might Benjamin Franklin think about the Civil War?
Benjamin Franklin might have thought that Civil war was unnecessary
What would happen if civil war would never happened?
The north and the south would still be mad at each other and we might have split into two different countries by now.
Why is it good to compare political parties?
The point of political parties is to give an overview of their issues so in a large country you don't have to personally know every candidate but rather you can look at their party to get a general overview of their positions. It is good to compare political parties to match your beliefs to so you know which candidates would be better to vote for. For example, if (all these examples are from the US) if you believe in less taxes and a stronger national defense, you might want to vote for the Republican party, if you believe in civil liberties and more government programs you might want to vote for the Democrat party, if you believe in civil liberties, less taxes and less government control, you might vote for the Libertarian Party, and if you believe that the main issue that governments should be concerned with is environmental protection and consumer protection, you might vote for the Green party.
