Dictatorships. Why? Because a signle person is given the power to do whatever they want. Whether it be kill a certain type of race or go to war with a neighbouring country. With a Dictatorship, the government is pretty much powerless, because the people vote on everything that goes on. I'll admit there are a few democracies out there that are corrupt and inefficient and try to get what they want done illegaly. But the people will always have the power to hire new people to fill any position they please, after the end of the job holders term.
The right to overthrow oppressive governments is not a right addressed by the universal declaration human rights. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights is generally agreed to be the foundation of international human rights law.
The wall prevented people from leaving. They were forced to stay on their side of the wall.
No set of human rights limits the rights of same-sex marriage. Only governments can limit human rights.
Whilst this is a matter of opinion, most law-abiding Australian citizens would say that anti-terrorism laws do not infringe on individual human rights. They would rather be safe and endure minor inconveniences than be allowed freedoms that also mean terrorists can easily get through minimal security measures.
The relationship between human rights and religious freedom can be complex and context-dependent. Generally, human rights frameworks prioritize the protection of individual rights, including freedom of belief and expression, which encompasses religious freedom. However, when religious practices infringe upon the rights of others—such as discrimination or violence—human rights may be seen as taking precedence. Ultimately, a balance must be sought that respects both individual rights and the freedom to practice religion.
Human rights are rights that are recognized and protected by laws and agreements made by governments and international organizations. Natural rights are rights that are believed to be inherent to all individuals by virtue of their humanity, regardless of any laws or agreements.
The governments should provide their citizens with all their human and universal rights as described by the constitution. All governments for instance are supposed to guarantee the safety of their citizens.
They pressurise governments and organisations and try to end human right abuses.
Most countries have formed their one human rights laws and guidelines. I would suggest contacting your local government offices for the information you require or the governments website.
If there were no human rights in Africa, it would likely lead to widespread oppression, discrimination, and abuse of power by governments and other authorities. The lack of fundamental rights would undermine social justice, exacerbate poverty, and hinder access to education and healthcare. This situation could fuel conflicts and instability, as marginalized groups might resist oppression, leading to increased violence and human suffering. Overall, the absence of human rights would severely impact the continent's development and the well-being of its people.
Human rights are less likely to be abused in wealthy countries as wealthy people have everything they want and dont need to fights for power... i think
Human rights are internationally recognized principles that protect individuals' inherent dignity and freedoms. While there are debates and challenges in upholding human rights, the concept itself is widely accepted and supported by many individuals, organizations, and governments around the world.