lobbied for anti-lynching laws
Anti-lynching laws were not passed by any house of Congress in 1922. Efforts to pass federal anti-lynching legislation faced significant opposition, and it was not until 2021 that the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Emmett Till Antilynching Act. However, the bill still needs approval from the Senate to become law.
FDR did not support a federal anti-lynching. FDR feared that if he supported the law, he would lose the votes of the southern house and senate members. Had he supported the law, he would not have been able to pass any of his other important and influencial laws.
Some of the reasons for the founding of the NAACP were:The desire to oppose racismAfrican Americans' desire for more opportunitiesJim Crow lawsSegregation laws
First off, they could not get enough votes from officials against lynching. Also, they did not want to lose the support from those who supported. IF these people turned on the government, then future progressive legislation would be much harder to pass. You can compare it to Lincoln's decision to not pass anti-slavery laws during that era. He did not want to lose the support of the southern officials.
by bringing laws suits
by bringing laws suits
As of October 2023, several states in the U.S. still have laws on the books that technically allow for lynching, although these laws are often outdated and not enforced. Notably, states like Mississippi and Alabama have faced criticism for retaining such laws despite their historical context and the recognition of lynching as a crime against humanity. Efforts to repeal these laws have been made to address their symbolic and legal implications in contemporary society.
Wilson did not support woman suffrage and introduced segregation into the federal government. He did not want to change things. He opposed federal anti-lynching laws and brought back segregated facilities.
NAACP
Some of the reasons for the founding of the NAACP were:The desire to oppose racismAfrican Americans' desire for more opportunitiesJim Crow lawsSegregation laws
NAACP v Alabama was important because it would have prohibited the NAACP from operating in the state of Alabama. The NAACP won the case and it was a big victory for civil rights.