Boston Massacre

Armed British soldiers patrolled the streets of small towns in Boston primarily to enforce colonial laws and maintain order in response to rising tensions between the British government and American colonists. Their presence aimed to suppress protests against British policies, particularly after events like the Boston Massacre in 1770, which heightened animosity. The soldiers also sought to protect British officials and loyalists while asserting British authority in a growing atmosphere of resistance and unrest among colonists.

The Boston Massacre in 1770 intensified anti-British sentiments among American colonists, as it symbolized the oppressive nature of British rule. The violent confrontation, which resulted in the deaths of five colonists, was used as a rallying point by revolutionary leaders like Samuel Adams and Paul Revere to galvanize public opinion against British authorities. This event contributed to a growing sense of unity among the colonies and highlighted the need for independence as a means to secure their rights and freedoms. Ultimately, the massacre served as a catalyst for the broader revolutionary movement that culminated in the call for independence.

Yes, George III was crowned before the Boston Massacre. He ascended to the throne on October 25, 1760, and was officially crowned on September 22, 1761. The Boston Massacre occurred later, on March 5, 1770. Thus, his coronation took place nearly a decade prior to this significant event in American history.

The Balangiga Massacre refers to a violent event that occurred on September 28, 1901, during the Philippine-American War. It involved a surprise attack by Filipino insurgents on American soldiers stationed in Balangiga, Eastern Samar, resulting in the deaths of 48 U.S. troops. In retaliation, American forces launched a brutal campaign against the local population, marked by widespread destruction and loss of life. The incident remains a significant and controversial chapter in Philippine-American history, symbolizing the complexities of colonialism and resistance.

The great massacre of 1622, often referred to as the "Massacre of the Dutch in Ambon," was led by the forces of the Sultan of Ternate, supported by the Portuguese. This violent event was part of the broader conflict between European colonial powers and local rulers in the Spice Islands. The massacre resulted in the deaths of many Dutch traders and soldiers, significantly impacting Dutch ambitions in the region.

The Boston Massacre, which occurred on March 5, 1770, was a pivotal event leading up to the American Revolution, but it was not a battle in itself. It heightened tensions between American colonists and British authorities, galvanizing public opinion against British rule and contributing to the growing desire for independence. The incident served as a symbol of British oppression, ultimately fueling revolutionary sentiment and actions that culminated in the fight for independence.

After the Boston Massacre in 1770, King George III sought to calm the colonists by repealing the Townshend Acts, which had imposed taxes on various goods. This decision aimed to reduce tensions and demonstrate a willingness to address colonial grievances. However, the repeal did not fully assuage colonial discontent, as underlying issues of representation and autonomy remained unresolved. The incident further fueled revolutionary sentiments among the colonists.

What happened in the orange-burg massacre: basically in 1968 3 coloured boys went down to a white bowling alley to see if they could play, but the man refused to serve them. So the 3 students returned back to their campus, on there way back they were followed back by some highway patrol officers (even though they hadn't done anything) and the 3 boys made a bonfire (a small one), which they were allowed to because it wasn't hurting anyone and it was their campus. But the bonfire got too big and the fire men had to be called to put it out by this time a lot of people had gathered round, not to protest but to see what was going on. After that more police men came and they came armed. The students on the campus didnt want to harm anybody, they just wanted to have a look. But because these students were coloured the police didnt care. The police were lined up, but didn't know what to do until one of the police men claimed that he heard gunfire coming from the students. So do you know what they did in pitch darkness! The men opened fire randomly on these students because someone claimed they heard gunfire, but know one else heard it. 27 students were injured and 3 were killed, one of the boys that was killed, was a 17 year old boy who was in high school waiting for his mum to come and pick him up. The policemen claimed that the students were running at the but all of the injuries in the students were in their back or shoulders indicating that they were running away or turning away! The people investigating were very biased and claimed that the students were trying to create a riot. The man who was blamed for this was Cleveland Sellers, the only reason he was even at the fire was because his friend woke him up to say there was a fire outside, Sellers got shot in the shoulder and in the hospital the police were going around to see who they thought started the riot and the accused Sellers without evidence or motive. They just accused him on the basis that he was at the bowling alley that night. Sellers had no say in this and was wrongfully imprisoned for 7 months, he was put in Mississippi jail which was the worst at the time because it was very racist, then the charges were changed and instead of being charged with starting a riot he got charged with being at the bowling alley. When he was let go there was no apology for what they had done. Sellers is now president of Vorhees College in South Carolina. This was very important in the civil rights movement and yet people are trying to cover it up and act like it never happened.

By Rea

The Boston Massacre is often referred to as the "Incident on King Street" because it occurred on King Street in Boston on March 5, 1770. This name highlights the specific location where British soldiers fired into a crowd of colonists, killing five and wounding several others. The term "incident" reflects the historical perspective that viewed the event as a pivotal moment in escalating tensions between the American colonists and British authorities. The incident played a crucial role in galvanizing public opinion against British rule and contributed to the growing revolutionary sentiment leading up to the American Revolution.

Yes, it is true that during the retreat to Boston after the Battles of Lexington and Concord on April 19, 1775, approximately 73 British soldiers, often referred to as redcoats, were killed. This number reflects the heavy casualties the British faced due to the colonial militias' ambush tactics along the route. The retreat was marked by significant losses for the British, highlighting the growing resistance against their rule in the colonies.