Censorship

Though some books are not appropriate for young people there are no prohibitions on age for reading any literature. The exceptions being those publications that deal only with adult material, especially photographic depictions.

I Could Rule the World if I Could only Get the Parts was created on 1982-11-08.

Your mom that's how.

Problem?

Jeremiah: Jeremiah 36:20-27

yes because that way you can't just bring any thing in side a school like a r rated movie because kids go to school and some young kid could walk by and be hurt for life

The reasoning behind banning censorship is based on history.

When citizens are not free to speak out against the government, the government becomes unaccountable. Then the people in power become disillusioned with their rule, often creating a dissatisfied society. Usually, this becomes a rebellion and causes chaos. The French Revolution and the American Revolution come to mind. Truth is, even when censorship was illegal, anger grew within a society, eventually it leads to beheading a Monarch... or an all-out war. Either way: there's death and destruction.

I do not know entirely myself, but this might help answer that syllabus question:

"In books II and III of the Republic, Socrates asserts that the stories told in his city must be censored before they are told to the citizens and guardians. Socrates finds stories in three main genres particularly problematic. These three genres are stories about the gods and heroes, the underworld of Hades, and stories about human beings. In this paper I will do four things. First, I will address Socrates' overarching argument for censorship: the impressionability of the general population and youths in particular. Then, I will describe the three genres of stories. After each description, I will address Socrates' argument for censoring that particular type of story. Finally, I will address the validity of Socrates' arguments. "

.....1).you should have a list of foods or things...that you buy....

..2).you should hve to be patience

Censorship was introduced so it would keep the Allied and German populace in the dark about the enormous casualties in their countries' armies. It was also introduced so that gruesome pictures weren't published and so would lower morale.

The Australian government didn't want anyone from the opposition of the war to find out any information that could be used against Australia, Great Britain or anyone else in the alliance we were part of.

One very important consideration was that Australia had a volunteer army. That is we did not have conscription. There fore the Australian government could not force people to go to war. by keeping the population of Australia in the dark about the carnage in Europe they hoped to keep up enlistment numbers.

http://bypass-rules.info

No he is not. Yet another ridiculous urban legend.

You can restrict, every thing the person using the computer, see's, you may view only things, which are for that exact age. My Filter's can show anything appropriate for 13Years old, or if I want I can change it to any age between 5 and 21.

Political censorship is what happens when the government tries to hide information from the public. Journalists are often coerced into spreading the falsified story.

government censorship

Byron Price

In Ray Bradbury's "Fahrenheit 451," Captain Beatty explains that censorship began gradually, as society prioritized comfort and conformity over individuality and critical thought. He describes how people became increasingly disinterested in complex ideas and literature, leading to the suppression of dissenting views. As a result, books were burned to eliminate conflicting opinions and maintain societal harmony, ultimately resulting in a culture that shunned deep reflection in favor of superficial entertainment.

Lobbying from religious (mainly Christian) and parental groups that believe most of the acts presented in television are "not fit for children or good moral people" and that it corrupts them. What they fail to realise is that you have to be 18 or over to see most of this material - which raises questions about the style of parenting there - and if you don't want to see it, then you don't have to.

Because of how mean satire is.

Several places have banned the book including: Amana, Iowa; Billings, Montana; Goose Lake, Iowa; Escondido, California; La Mesa-Spring Valley, California; Spenser, Wisconsin; Stafford, Virginia; Wichita Falls, Texas; and Dublin, Ohio.

http://www.bannedlibrary.com/podcast/2016/2/20/banned-50-the-witches-by-roald-dahl

That really depends on your own personal and political viewpoints....

Some thing government sensorship is good as it can promote harmony and discourage insightment to violence, prejudice and avoid offending others

However, some would argue that any form of censorship is bad as it infringes your right to express your views, culture and religion and therefore can hinder democracy, as the Government can silence those with opposing opinons and is often used in dictatorships

Actually there are many cons to interent censorship. it completely and utterly intrudes on our freedoms as a nation. Thomas Jefferson, considered one of the most intelligent people to walk the earth, built with many others the greatest country in the world on the simple fact of Freedom. Freedom is a right we are given as a country, so if you are willing to lose your freedoms vote for censorship. Though the latest graph for online censorship shows the most censored countries are actually COMMUNIST NATIONS.

Last time around, it was when France had been liberated from the Germans in WW2, in 1944.

Personally, I am against censorship. Parents and young adults should have the choice to read these books or not. If you don't want to you don't have to. My point being this is a free country and you should have the choice or not.