Censorship

music is cisum spelled frontwards with an m, u, s, i, and finishing it off with a c, no just the c, not the a. Oh well, anyways it is spell with an m and this word ends in an usic.

Sinclair Lewis for one.

Freedom of expression

The burning of books likely had a profound emotional and psychological impact on the authors whose works were destroyed, as it symbolized a rejection of their ideas and expressions. Such acts often instilled a sense of loss and frustration, as authors saw their labor and creativity erased, potentially stifling future expression and innovation. Additionally, the act of censorship could instigate fear and discourage other writers from exploring controversial or dissenting themes, leading to a chilling effect on literary and intellectual freedom.

Censorship can be a complex issue, as it often involves balancing the protection of certain groups, such as minors, with the principles of free expression. While some materials, like graphic violence or explicit content, may warrant restrictions to safeguard vulnerable populations, overly broad censorship can stifle creativity and limit access to diverse viewpoints. Ultimately, the justification for restricting material should be carefully considered, weighing the potential harm against the values of freedom and open discourse.

Censorship is closely related to the First Amendment, which protects freedoms concerning speech, religion, press, assembly, and petition. The First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting expression, meaning that censorship can be viewed as a violation of these fundamental rights. When authorities censor content, whether in media, art, or speech, they undermine the democratic principles of free expression and open discourse that the First Amendment aims to uphold. Thus, discussions about censorship often revolve around the balance between protecting free speech and addressing potential harms or misinformation.

A form of censorship is the suppression or restriction of speech, public communication, or other information deemed objectionable or harmful by authorities or organizations. This can include the banning of books, filtering of online content, and the regulation of media outlets. Censorship can occur in various contexts, from government actions to corporate policies, and often raises concerns regarding freedom of expression and access to information.

The purpose of blogging is to express one's thoughts without any consequences, but many governments (including the United States) believe that certain statements are not deserving of protection. For example, if one were to blog that the president should be killed or that some celebrity ought to be murdered, that would not be protected under the First Amendment, and might cause criminal charges to be placed against the person who made the statement. In general, the governments in most democracies leave opinion blogs alone, even if the opinions expressed are not popular or are controversial-- as long the line is not crossed regarding threats of violence.

There are some people who believe that blogs deserve to be censored for bad language or for displaying racist/sexist/homophobic speech or images. This is controversial, because some First Amendment supporters believe even content that might be considered vulgar or offensive must not be censored. Often, it is advocacy groups made up of parents, educators, or members of the clergy, who believe children should be protected from vulgar and bigoted content and thus, they feel it is acceptable to exert some control over what can and cannot be blogged.

This is a topic that inspires very passionate and polarized views. The blogging community, understandably, does not like censorship of any kind; but the people who believe they are just protecting their kids have equally strong opinions on the topic. There will probably continue to be a push-pull dynamic, with attempts made to censor some controversial sites, and civil libertarians pushing back.

Certain pieces of news were not broadcast Certain photos were banned The Communist newspaper The Daily Worker was banned in 1941 because it opposed the war Soldiers' letters were censored to delete all mention of times and places.

FCC

anyone can join HOSA. except if you have red hair you aren't allowed to. also if you're fat.

Well, lessening of differing opinion, for one. Less original thought and action, apparently. More leisure time, less decision-making. Less value placed on human life. Bigger rifts between people who live in the cities and those who lived outside. ... Of course, this wasn't mild labeling or typical censorship. This was no books, period. Another effect, predictably, was rebellion. People who refused to live by the new rules.
The book Fahrenheit 451 deals with censorship because that is what the 'firemen' were doing- they were censoring what people could and could not do and was controlling their freedom to read.

No, they graduated high school and spent hours teaching themselves what was known about aerodynamics.

In this example, express is an adjective and not a verb. Hearing it as a verb, the ear wants to modify the word to expressed, with a sense: the consent that has been expressed by someone or something. But this is not the correct use of the word in your example. Express written consent means: the consent that has been directly, firmly and explicitly stated. Another example: "He disobeyed my express orders." So, "express written consent" is correct.

Censorship limits freedom of expression. It also limits the right of TV viewers, art viewers, or book readers to choose the content they want to take in.

In which nation would you find censorship of information, news, or any speech that is critical of the government?

Censorship in South Africa is a contentious issue, as it must be balanced against the right to freedom of speech enshrined in the Constitution. While certain forms of censorship, such as those aimed at protecting national security, public order, or preventing hate speech, may be justified, excessive censorship can infringe on individual rights and stifle public discourse. Ultimately, the challenge lies in ensuring that any restrictions on speech are proportionate and necessary, preserving the democratic values of open dialogue and expression.

Yes, in USA, often scenes are cut from films to conform to ratings, which some consider censorship. In other countries, censorship may be legal: it is not legal in USA.

Then, (often in USA) when the director's cut becomes available, the scenes are re-placed and or are available as extras on the DVD.

Censorship can be used to remove copyright material if the material does not belong to you.

No. The problem with your question is who decides that there is "too much" and why. Your question leads to censorship and the freedom of speech is an important right.

If you have to ask that, then you are obviously not old enough to be looking at what ever you are seeking.