Censorship

It was so that the enemy couldn't gain sensitive information i.e. London has never been bombed.

But of course London has been bombed many times but you get the gist.

Hope it helps :-)

I have an answer, kind of. I actually have the same question. I need some good debate material for my 11th grade English class, but am unable to find anything. I also feel sad because you asked your question 10 years ago and it is stale, left unanswered. In my one opinion with brief knowledge of the Enlightenment, the government and church officials probably believed that everything in life could be explained by the bible and that their ancient practices were perfect. I would assume that they felt fear in that people might retaliate, and they would lose power and control of the people. These new ideas about the world probably scared some of the older officials and church elders because new information and practices can sometime be unsettling or even frightening to older and 'wiser' people. And the same is mostly true nowadays, many older people resent change and are very conservative about everything (not just politically speaking either). That's just how it is sometimes. I hope I was able to shed some light on your question. Don't have a good day, have a great day!

-Caden Lee Widicker

I don't remember it offhand, but have you checked gamefaqs.com or done a google search?

Censorship fits the above description.

the inappropriate material which is against the prescribe guidlines are eliminated from a motion picture

He does not. The 042 claim is not based on fact. It comes from a group of people called the "Birthers," who believe the president was not born in the United States and his birth certificate is a fake. The claim you cited, that he has a social security number from someone who is deceased (or from someone living in Connecticut, depending on which version you have heard), is one of the most common assertions made by the Birthers, but it is not true.

The information to support this claim comes from a woman named Orly Taitz, who is not a reliable or objective source, since she believes the president is from Kenya and has repeatedly tried, and failed, to prove this. A number of reliable websites, such as snopes.com and factcheck.org have shown over and over that her claims are false, but she and the Birthers persist in believing the president is from another country. He is not. He was born in Hawaii, and while I have not seen his Social Security card, I would imagine he got his first one in whatever city where he had his first job as a kid.

Hell if I know I'M just a computer. You do the math retard

they disagree

books being taken off shelves and not being tought in classes

Both are used but not really related, hence I wonder about the comparison, anyway, censorship means deleting parts of the publication (for example, to remove pornography), while classifcation is categorizing publications such as PG-13, R, etc... It might also mean other things.

Yes. Most theater chains refuse to book a film rated "NC-17" regardless of the subject matter.

of course the censorship should exist because theres lots of children using on appropriate words for each other and violence is not good for them at all.

music is cisum spelled frontwards with an m, u, s, i, and finishing it off with a c, no just the c, not the a. Oh well, anyways it is spell with an m and this word ends in an usic.

Sinclair Lewis for one.

Freedom of expression

The burning of books likely had a profound emotional and psychological impact on the authors whose works were destroyed, as it symbolized a rejection of their ideas and expressions. Such acts often instilled a sense of loss and frustration, as authors saw their labor and creativity erased, potentially stifling future expression and innovation. Additionally, the act of censorship could instigate fear and discourage other writers from exploring controversial or dissenting themes, leading to a chilling effect on literary and intellectual freedom.

Censorship can be a complex issue, as it often involves balancing the protection of certain groups, such as minors, with the principles of free expression. While some materials, like graphic violence or explicit content, may warrant restrictions to safeguard vulnerable populations, overly broad censorship can stifle creativity and limit access to diverse viewpoints. Ultimately, the justification for restricting material should be carefully considered, weighing the potential harm against the values of freedom and open discourse.

Censorship is closely related to the First Amendment, which protects freedoms concerning speech, religion, press, assembly, and petition. The First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting expression, meaning that censorship can be viewed as a violation of these fundamental rights. When authorities censor content, whether in media, art, or speech, they undermine the democratic principles of free expression and open discourse that the First Amendment aims to uphold. Thus, discussions about censorship often revolve around the balance between protecting free speech and addressing potential harms or misinformation.

A form of censorship is the suppression or restriction of speech, public communication, or other information deemed objectionable or harmful by authorities or organizations. This can include the banning of books, filtering of online content, and the regulation of media outlets. Censorship can occur in various contexts, from government actions to corporate policies, and often raises concerns regarding freedom of expression and access to information.