Genocide

Roman Catholics believe he was in the upper room celebrating the Passover with his apostles.

In Rwanda.

On the surface, life in Rwanda today seems to be on the up. Mobiles, internet cafes, new construction and a veneer of calm make it appear one of the calmest African countries.

The Khmer Rouge regime was toppled by the Vietnamese invasion. Funny how people keep using Pol Pot as an example of how bad communism is, yet it also took another communist country to put an end to the slaughter. Western nations did nothing about it, shamefully.

Acc to UN, Basic world media, there is no established GENOCIDE in Tibet (at least with number of deaths). No comparison with Rwanda, Armenia, Bangladesh or even Darfur. Yes, displacement and forced migration is there, including Dalai Lama fled to India.

none, there is no prove of physical genocide in tibet. But there were some culture genocide during the culture revolution in the 60s and 70s, (culture genocide is the attempt to abolish old tibetan practices) however Tibetans are free to practice there religion after death of Mao and the end of culture revolution. However the culture revolution wasnt aimed at tibetan culture.

The Holocaust was a number of distinct genocides operating in parallel. The definition of a genocide is the intentional extermination of a certain racial, ethnic, religious, physically different, or sexually identified group based on their status in that group. The Holocaust has that in spades. Jews, Romani, homosexuals, handicapped, etc. individuals were targeted precisely because of their being in one group or another. Further to the point, the word genocide was coined precisely to discuss the particular crimes committed in the Holocaust.

For killings based purely on race - presumably the Holocaust, followed by the Armenian Massacres of 1915 (last of several purges).

Numerically, the Gulag and other deliberate Soviet slaughter would dwarf both of these.

The genocide in Cambodia claimed about 1.7 million persons.

Pol Pot did affect the world through his racist sentiments. As a leader, he helped the spread of slave trade especially in areas where he had jurisdictions.

Often people refer to the mass death of Native Americans within 50 years of European arrival as a genocide. While there was certainly a large percenatage of deaths (in some places as high as ninety percent), there was not a clear motive to kill the Native Americans and most succumbed to disease that the colonizers did not intend to spread.

The word genocide was made when there was a "genocide", Genocide is like a war but MUCH MUCH worse. Its when a nationality kills EVERY person from another nationality. The first genocide was 1915-1918. The Turkish killed 1,500, 000 Armenians when the Armenians were innocent. It was the only genocide in history. Some Armenians survived, like my great grandparents. Lets hope nothing bad to the Armenians. Thanks for reading!

Almost 7 years. From April 1915 to beginning of 1922

A clash between white farmers and an all-black militia

It of course depends on how one defines the word 'holocaust', if you look it up online you'll most likely find this definition ''great destruction or loss of life or the source of such destruction, esp fire''. Many other holocausts have happened other than The Holocaust, for example, the mass murders in Cambodia, Vietnam, Rwanda, USSR, Uganda, Japan(atomic holocaust) and many, many others. The Holocaust in Germany and Poland, under the rule of Adolf Hitler was nothing special nor much different when you look at it closely, and investigate the evidence yourself.

Anti- Laotian & Vietnamese racism couples with a wish to return to the Angkor, the empire once centred in Khmer with himself as the centre piece and the peasants worlking with a version of Theravada biddhism holding the whole thing together, was a dogma based system of extermination of 2 million people (he also had some ideas on racial purity though they were secondary, murdering criplled, lame, anyone he thought was an intellectual because they wouldn't be a good worker and also, for some reason, homosexuals)

No. The number of casualties was very high, but that doesn't make World War 1 genocide.

genocide has been taking place all over the world since as early as 6oo B.C. when the Babylonians conquered Jerusalem and razing the Great Temple to the ground or maybe in 70 A.D. when the Roman emperor Titus slaughtered the 600,000 Jews that were living in Jerusalem, and only the Jews.

Being the first Genocide in modern history and in the 20th century the Armenian Genocide represents a turning point in history. It was the first time since 146 BC, that the world witnessed a mass massacre planned to abolish a complete race. It didn't catch enough attention at that time and was pretty much forgotten until mass massacres such as the Holocaust and the massacres in Rwanda. So it is very important to acknowledge the Armenian Genocide in order to prevent barbarism against mankind.

The Young Turks, the political group in power of the Ottoman Empire in 1915, had originally agreed to allow the Armenians to have much more equal rights than they did before under the rule of the sultan, Abdul Hamid. However, as they hoped to see the Ottoman Empire return to their former glory, they wanted to expand eastward. However, the eastern section held most of the Armenian population. They would have to move them out of the way so they could expand.

When WWI broke out, many Turks began growing suspicious of the Armenians forming a "secret alliance" with the Russians, the country they happened to be fighting. They realized that this was an opportunity to solve "the Armenian question," as the rest of the world would understand their dire measures they had to take to bring back the power of their Empire. They confiscated any weapon any Armenian owned, and began the Armenian Genocide.

A race murderer

A genocide is when a person or a group of people try to exterminate a whole race or culture. The Hutu's were trying to extermanate the Tutsi's because of their race. That's what made it a genocide.