Nuclear Weapons

True

Its pretty much spyware, it remembers which website's you visit and sends that to the owner of the toolbar.

Get a PhD Physics degree, study nuclear engineering while doing that. Apply for jobs at the weapons labs (Los Alamos, Livermore, Sandia), if they accept you they will apply for a clearance for you, the FBI will spend at least 2 years investigating at least 10 years of your life, if the FBI approves you you will sign a pile of NDAs, then you can begin your job. (tedious eh?)

In almost every state in the country, in submarines, etc.

1 man army on all of your classes, and a different class for every situation (sniper + stopping power; claymore + danger close; grenade launcher + frag grenade + danger close; hardline class to switch to when 2 kills from a killstreak; stealth class for when air support is up; etc.)

America has the most nuclear weapons

We know for certain that they have nuclear bombs. They would probably only use them if we pushed them or South Korea invaded. So, as far as we know, they are not planning to bomb us, but they probably will if provoked too much.

There has never been a nuclear explosion in the state of Texas

There is NO difference; a nuclear weapon is a nuclear weapon.

A tactical nuclear weapon is normally deployed from a nuclear cannon (atomic cannon/nuclear artillery). These pieces were developed in the 1950s, and fired quite frequently in Nevada at atomic test sites.

Strategy is the big picture.

Tactics is the small picture.

Or, as Napoleon may have once said, "Strategy is out of cannon range, tactics is within cannon range."

------------------------------------

The difference is explosive yield. Regular nukes are typically measured in megatons, while tactical nukes are smaller and measured in kilotons. Tactical nukes were intended to be used at the tactical level against specific battlefield targets and in relative close proximity to friendly troops. Regular nukes were meant as a deterrence and were intended to destroy large cities.

Mostly NO. Bank Vaults are made from heavy weight metals which can prevent human intrusion by force. Nuclear Attacks are of a different kind and such heavy metals are of no use when such an attack happens.

Maybe an expert in Nuclear Sciences can confirm my theory.

Close, but allow me to update your answer. In a nuclear attack we have three destructive elements Blast, Thermal radiation (heat radiation), and fall out type of radiation. There are more but for this discussion lets keep it simple.

A bank vault may save you from the blast, and most bank vaults have thick high density concrete walls reinforced with re-bar. This would be a moderate blast shield, however it would depend on your distance from the detonation and the size of the nuclear device. Test are done in PSI (pounds per square inch). Certain concrete structures can take certain amounts of PSI loads, and based on your distance from the detonation would determine the PSI load on the structure (bank vault). The bank vault would be excellent protection from the Thermal effect at a distance. Being at ground zero or within a mile of a 750kt strike, you would be vaporized, even in the vault. As in fallout, radioactivity that falls in debris, you would have some what descent protection. But you would need food and water stocks, due to the 3 to 5 weeks you need to stay in the vault until the fallout radiation level dropped enough to come out. A good basement with bags of earth above you would afford the same protection as the vault for the fact it is not in direct view of the blast. Now if you found a bank vault in a basement, then you are set since it is protected from line of sight effects of the blast and affords protection characteristics of being underground.

In the related links box below, I posted some information about this.

Harry S. Truman was the US President at the end of World War II. The only two atomic bombs ever used in warfare were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan, on August 6 and August 9, 1945.

Leo Szilard in 1933, patented in 1934 as Great Britain # 630,726.

Then it took the work of thousands off people to transform the invention into a workable device in 1945.

The threat of nuclear war has become a symbol for the stresses and problems of

living in the modern age that are often complex, insidious, and over which the

average citizen often feels little control. The threat of war, including nuclear war,

continues to be a major source of worry for youth and adolescents. Worry over nuclear war, however, recedes with age and by adulthood most people do not spend too much time worrying about the threat of nuclear war, most people do little about

the threat of nuclear weapons, even though the majority of the population favor

a nuclear freeze. Even if they do worry, most individuals tend to respond to the threat of nuclear weapons with a sense of helplessness and avoidance of the issues.

Today eight countries are in possessionn of nuclear weapons. The five nuclear weapons states United States, Russia (former Soviet Union), United Kingdom, France and China, are the only countries allowed to have nuclear weapons according to the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) from 1970. All members of the United Nations except Israel, India and Pakistan have signed the NPT.

At end of world war two, two were dropped in Japan, which ended the japan - America conflict

Pinnacle - Empty Quiver. Certain types of loss might be classified as Pinnacle - Broken Arrow instead.

(Some people may tell you that it should be "Rogue Spear" based on the computer game, which is reasonable considering the terminology for other similar events, but that term was made up by the writer.)

the best country that has the best nucler weapons has too be United States there good

some of The weapons that that the first nations had were Bow and arrows, spears and fishing gaffs

1943

North Korea.

While there were gunfighters that carried two pistols, but the average cowpoke wouldn't have been able to afford two pistols since one was about three or more months pay. There were various kinds of guns that cowboys used. They fell into two categories: hand gun and rifle. The most common handguns were the Derringer and the Colt .45; as for rifles there was the Winchester. Most of the time guns were used for shooting animals for food or calming the cattle. Occasionally, a cowboy might have to use one against Indians or rustlers. The star of old westerns, and the gun most often hung in the gun belt of western pioneers was the Peace Maker from Colt. The official name was the "Colt Single Action Army .45" or the "SAA". The historical masterpiece of Colt first went on sale in 1873, and was just as valued in pioneering the west as the trustworthy Winchester M1873 rifle.

No, surviving a nuclear explosion by hiding in a fridge like in the movie "Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull" is not realistic. The impact and heat from a nuclear explosion would be far too extreme for a refrigerator to provide any protection. It's best to follow official safety guidelines for nuclear emergencies.