0
Nuremberg Trials
The Nuremberg Trials were tribunals held by the Allied Forces after World War 2. More than twenty leaders of the Third Reich were tried for the atrocities committed during the Holocaust, as well as other war crimes.
266 Questions
Who were the defendants at the Nuremberg trials?
A total of 22 high-ranking Nazis and Nazi supporters were tried by the IMT (or International Military Tribunal). For a list of the 22 defendants and their sentences, please see the Related Link below. See the "Main Trial" section of the Wikipedia article for the information you seek.
Who was the US Supreme Court justice who served as the US Prosecutor at the Nuremberg Trials?
US Supreme Court justice Robert Jackson was the Chief US Prosecutor at the Nuremberg Trials of Nazi war criminals, which began in November 1945 and concluded in October 1946.
What was the major result of the Nuremberg trials?
The major result of the Nuremberg trials was the establishment of the principle that individuals can be held accountable for committing international crimes, such as crimes against humanity and war crimes. This helped lay the foundation for modern international criminal law and the prosecution of individuals responsible for atrocities.
What happened to those that were on the Nuremberg trials?
The convicted ones were sent away to serve their sentences.
The court officials went back to their homes wherever they lived. These people came from all over, most were American or European. The military personnel went on to continue serving their country.
Did any Nazis escape prosecution in the Nuremberg trials?
Some notable Nazis authoritative absented at the Nuremberg trials because of their death. There were Adolf Hitler, Heinrich Himmler, Reinhard Heydrich, and Joseph Goebbels. Robert Ley and Hermann Göring managed to commit suicide during the trials. 3 of other 24 notable Nazis were acquitted: Hjalmar Schacht, Hans Fritzsche, and Franz von Papen. Gustav Krupp von Bohlen und Halbach escaped punishment by medical reasons.
What defense did the defendants use during the Nuremberg Trials?
Some of the common defenses for the one hundred plus people who were tried were:
- He or she was only following orders.
- I did not know about the concentration camps or whatever they were charged with.
- It was war. You have to expect this (their charge) to happen in war.
- Hitler ordered it. I had to do it or be killed by Hitler.
- I was not there, never heard of it, I did not do it or this tribunal is not lawful.
They argued that the accused were simply 'obeying orders'.
How many Nazi leaders were put to death at the Nuremberg trials?
11 were hanged and one (Goering) comitted suicide the night before his execution.
Which principle was established by the Nuremberg Trials after World War 2?
Individuals can be punished for their part in state-sponsored crimes.
People were protected from being tested on without full knowledge of it, it's repercussions and that the person must be able to understand it full well, that what test is being administered. Nothing Like Every one Being Tested on today as far as Chem-trails Billions in Barium, Aluminum, Strontium. Some 49 Chemical with 300 times the legal limit in our atmosphere. along With The Microwaves Being transmitted by H.A.A.R.P. upon this planet at their will. a 40 year period 500,000 people were tested successes is to cause all kinds of head and body function problems. This is on Every one NOW!
This justice served as the chief prosecutor at the Nuremberg trials of nazi war criminals?
Robert H. Jackson served as the chief prosecutor at the Nuremberg trials of Nazi war criminals. He was an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States.
What were the names of the men who were acquitted at the Nuremberg trials?
Hjalmar Schacht, Franz von Papen, Hans Fritzsche, and Franz Halder were some of the prominent figures who were acquitted at the Nuremberg trials.
Did Nuremberg agree that it was okay to say you were only following orders?
No, the Nuremberg trials established that individuals are responsible for their actions, even if they were following orders. The principle of "just following orders" is not a valid defense for committing war crimes or crimes against humanity.
What principles did the Nuremberg trials demonstrate?
The Legal Principles from the Nuremberg Trials are:
- Anyone who commits international crime is guilty.
- Guilty under international standards technically means there are no punishments, but punishments will be given out.
- Being at a high position doesn't relieve someone from punishment.
- Provided a moral choice, someone is guilty if a higher authority ordered the specific crime to be committed.
- IE: Hitler made Nazi officers kill. The Nazi officer is still guilty.
Why were the Nuremberg trials necessary?
yes, they were a propaganda tool. That is not to say that the war criminals should not have been tried, but rather that the Nuremberg trials were made to be as public as possible to show that the Nazis were over and that justice was seen to be done.
What was the cost of the Nuremberg Trials?
The cost of the Nuremberg Trials was around $1.5 million. The expenses covered various aspects such as personnel salaries, court proceedings, and logistics.
What are the reasons why the Nuremberg trials created?
The Nuremberg trials were created in response to the atrocities committed during World War II, aiming to hold individuals accountable for war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide. They sought to establish a precedent for international law and ensure that those responsible for these crimes faced justice.
Who was the chief prosecuter at the Nuremberg trials of war?
The chief prosecutor at the Nuremberg trials of war criminals was Robert H. Jackson, an American Supreme Court Justice. He led the prosecution team in presenting evidence against top Nazi officials for crimes against humanity.
What were the effects of the Nuremberg trials?
The Nuremberg trials held after World War II established the principles of individual accountability for war crimes and crimes against humanity. It set a precedent for prosecuting individuals responsible for atrocities, regardless of their official positions. The trials also brought attention to the horrors of the Holocaust and helped in shaping international humanitarian law.
What was the impact of the Nuremberg trials?
The Nuremberg trials held after World War II established the principle that individuals can be held accountable for committing crimes against humanity. This laid the foundation for modern international criminal law and helped shape the development of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The trials also highlighted the importance of upholding human rights and seeking justice for victims of atrocities.
Who was the least person hung at the Nuremberg trials?
Hjalmar Schacht was acquitted at the Nuremberg trials and was not sentenced to death.
What was the importance of the Nuremberg trials?
The Nuremberg trials were crucial in establishing legal precedents for prosecuting individuals for war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide. These trials helped bring Nazi war criminals to justice and aimed to ensure accountability for their actions during World War II. Additionally, the trials highlighted the importance of international cooperation and the rule of law in addressing atrocities committed during times of conflict.
Was the Nuremberg trials successful?
The Nuremberg Trials are considered successful in establishing the principle of individual accountability for international crimes and laying the foundation for modern international criminal law. They held senior Nazi officials responsible for their roles in atrocities committed during World War II, setting a precedent for holding individuals accountable for such crimes.
What were the outcomes of the Nuremberg Trials?
The outcomes of the Nuremberg Trials included the condemnation of top Nazi officials for war crimes, crimes against humanity, and crimes against peace. Twelve defendants were sentenced to death, three were acquitted, and others received varying prison terms. The trials established the principle that individuals could be held accountable for committing atrocities under international law.
What principles did the Nuremberg Trials establish?
The Nuremberg trials established the principles of international law. One of the principles states that anyone who commits a crime under international law is responsible for their actions and liable to punishment. Another says that if a person carries out an act on orders from his or her government or superior, it doesn't mean they are not liable for what they did if they were able to make a moral choice.
No, because we all have to accept responsibility for our own actions. I accept this is not an actual parallel: I was once in a group given a command to do something and another member of the group said to us that this command was illegal. There was a 'discussion' for want of a better description. Views were exchanged. The outcome was that we decided to obey what we knew was an illegal command & argue about it later. In other words we did what we were told. We obeyed orders. No I am not condoning what the Nazis did in any way. But the reality was that they had no real choice. It was the same in the recruitment for the Soviet prisoners into the Whermacht: 'Will you sign up to join the Whermacht ?' 'No' and he gets shot dead..... the remainder sign up. No, I do not agree with the defence. Yes, I am saying the reality was that there were no realistic alternatives to doing what they actually did. The orders were illegal & immoral & indefencible but they were unavoidable.
What legal principles were applied to the Nuremberg Trials?
The main legal principles applied at the Nuremberg Trials were that individuals can be held accountable for committing crimes against humanity, even if they were following orders from a higher authority, and that war crimes are punishable under international law. The trials also established the concept of "crimes against peace" as a basis for prosecuting individuals who initiate aggressive wars.
