answersLogoWhite

0

Patrick Henry

Patrick Henry is most famous for his fiery speech which ended "Give me liberty or give me death." A self taught lawyer, he was instrumental in contributing to public opinion during the American Revolution.

695 Questions

What is it to give in?

To give in means to surrender or yield to something or someone. It can refer to giving up an argument or contention, or it can also refer to giving in to temptation or pressure. Giving in often implies compromising one's own beliefs or desires in favor of someone else's or to avoid conflict.

How did Virginia lawyer and politician Patrick Henry contribute to the American Revolution?

Virginia lawyer and politician Patrick Henry lived at the height of tensions between Britain and the American Colonists. He was vocally opposed to the Stamp and Townshend Acts and the other long list of taxes Britain imposed on its people in the New World. In 1775, Henry gave his famous speech "Give Me Liberty Or Give Me Death" to the Virginia Assembly. However, Patrick Henry did not write out his speech, and no one wrote out his words as he spoke, so all we have today is the oral remembrances of what he said, such as what Henry's first biographer, William Wirt of Maryland, wrote out later.

'What made Patrick Henry write his speech 'Give me Liberty Or Give me Death'?

he got tired of people changing everthing like taxes, and he wanted to show the people that you can have freedom. he also was a horny basterd...

Did Patrick Henry have any sisters or brothers?

Patrick Henry was the second of ten brothers and sisters...i dont konw their names.

How was Patrick Henry talent for oratory particularly suited to his time?

Yes, Patrick Henry was a great orator and speaker. As a champion for freedom and rights, Henry spoke out against British tyranny on all levels.

How many children did Patrick Henry have with his first wife?

Patrick Henry had 2 wives.his first was Sarah and his 2nd was dorothea.:)

Why was Patrick Henry against the loyalists?

Patrick Henry was against the loyalists because he believed their allegiance to the British crown undermined the colonies' pursuit of independence and self-governance. He viewed loyalists as a threat to the revolutionary cause, arguing that their loyalty to Britain favored tyranny over the liberties and rights of the American people. Henry's famous declaration, "Give me liberty, or give me death," encapsulated his commitment to freedom and resistance against British oppression, contrasting sharply with the loyalists' stance. Ultimately, he saw the struggle for independence as essential for the establishment of a just and free society.

What was the statement that Patrick Henry said that you all know now?

He gave the speech "Give Me Liberty, Or Give Me Death" speech called Treason.

How does Patrick Henry describe King George III?

Liberty or Death
March 23, 1775

No man thinks more highly than I do of the patriotism, as well as abilities, of the very worthy gentlemen who have just addressed the House. But different men often see the same subject in different lights; and, therefore, I hope it will not be thought disrespectful to those gentlemen if, entertaining as I do opinions of a character very opposite to theirs, I shall speak forth my sentiments freely and without reserve. This is no time for ceremony. The question before the House is one of awful moment to this country. For my own part, I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery; and in proportion to the magnitude of the subject ought to be the freedom of the debate. It is only in this way that we can hope to arrive at truth, and fulfill the great responsibility which we hold to God and our country. Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offense, I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my country, and of an act of disloyalty toward the Majesty of Heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings.

Mr. President, it is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the song of that siren till she transforms us into beasts. Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we disposed to be of the number of those who, having eyes, see not, and, having ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation? For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst, and to provide for it.

I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided, and that is the lamp of experience. I know of no way of judging of the future but by the past. And judging by the past, I wish to know what there has been in the conduct of the British ministry for the last ten years to justify those hopes with which gentlemen have been pleased to solace themselves and the House. Is it that insidious smile with which our petition has been lately received? Trust it not, sir; it will prove a snare to your feet. Suffer not yourselves to be betrayed with a kiss. Ask yourselves how this gracious reception of our petition comports with those warlike preparations which cover our waters and darken our land. Are fleets and armies necessary to a work of love and reconciliation? Have we shown ourselves so unwilling to be reconciled that force must be called in to win back our love? Let us not deceive ourselves, sir. These are the implements of war and subjugation; the last arguments to which kings resort. I ask gentlemen, sir, what means this martial array, if its purpose be not to force us to submission? Can gentlemen assign any other possible motive for it? Has Great Britain any enemy, in this quarter of the world, to call for all this accumulation of navies and armies? No, sir, she has none. They are meant for us: they can be meant for no other. They are sent over to bind and rivet upon us those chains which the British ministry have been so long forging. And what have we to oppose to them? Shall we try argument? Sir, we have been trying that for the last ten years. Have we anything new to offer upon the subject? Nothing. We have held the subject up in every light of which it is capable; but it has been all in vain. Shall we resort to entreaty and humble supplication? What terms shall we find which have not been already exhausted? Let us not, I beseech you, sir, deceive ourselves. Sir, we have done everything that could be done to avert the storm which is now coming on. We have petitioned; we have remonstrated; we have supplicated; we have prostrated ourselves before the throne, and have implored its interposition to arrest the tyrannical hands of the ministry and Parliament. Our petitions have been slighted; our remonstrances have produced additional violence and insult; our supplications have been disregarded; and we have been spurned, with contempt, from the foot of the throne! In vain, after these things, may we indulge the fond hope of peace and reconciliation. There is no longer any room for hope. If we wish to be free--if we mean to preserve inviolate those inestimable privileges for which we have been so long contending--if we mean not basely to abandon the noble struggle in which we have been so long engaged, and which we have pledged ourselves never to abandon until the glorious object of our contest shall be obtained--we must fight! I repeat it, sir, we must fight! An appeal to arms and to the God of hosts is all that is left us!

They tell us, sir, that we are weak; unable to cope with so formidable an adversary. But when shall we be stronger? Will it be the next week, or the next year? Will it be when we are totally disarmed, and when a British guard shall be stationed in every house? Shall we gather strength by irresolution and inaction? Shall we acquire the means of effectual resistance by lying supinely on our backs and hugging the delusive phantom of hope, until our enemies shall have bound us hand and foot? Sir, we are not weak if we make a proper use of those means which the God of nature hath placed in our power. The millions of people, armed in the holy cause of liberty, and in such a country as that which we possess, are invincible by any force which our enemy can send against us. Besides, sir, we shall not fight our battles alone. There is a just God who presides over the destinies of nations, and who will raise up friends to fight our battles for us. The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave. Besides, sir, we have no election. If we were base enough to desire it, it is now too late to retire from the contest. There is no retreat but in submission and slavery! Our chains are forged! Their clanking may be heard on the plains of Boston! The war is inevitable-and let it come! I repeat it, sir, let it come.

It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace-but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!

What did pactrick Henry do to oppose the stamp act?

because he felt as if the british were being unfair and he showed no loyality to the king. no taxation waithout representation.

wrong!!!!!!

What is a similarity between George Washington's letter and Patrick Henry's speech?

MAcolm X cites Patrick Henry and George Washington as leaders he learned about who fought with extremism. Macolm X even quotes "liberty or death" more than once in his Ballot or Bullet speech. Speech http://www.cis.aueb.gr/Besides%20Security/TALKS/TALKS-10-X%20(The%20Ballot%20or%20the%20Bullet).pdf

How old is Patrick Henry?

Patrick Henry was born on May 29, 1736 and died on June 6, 1799. Patrick Henry would have been 63 years old at the time of death or 279 years old today.

Did people like Patrick Henry in his colony?

Some thought he was a nice delegate., but some called him a threat. and you can tell not many people liked him because they called him treason just after his liberty or death speech.

Why does Patrick Henry object so strongly to the phrase you the people as used by the framers of the constitution?

He thought it was up to the People not the States to rule the Country. The first words were "We, the States..."

What famous quote is attributed to Patrick Henry?

Two major quotes are attributed to Patrick Henry:

"Caesar had his Brutus; Charles the First his Cromwell; and George the Third ....may he profit by their example. If thisbe treason, make the most of it!"

and

"Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!"

The first, when quoted, is often shortened to just "If this be treason, make the most of it!"

The second, when quoted, is often shortened to simply "Give me liberty or give me death!"

Why was Patrick Henry remembered?

Patrick Henry is remembered for his encouraging speech in the Revolutionary War "Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death"