Skim Milk

You raise an interesting question. Recently, a Harvard researcher gave a provocative talk on the association between cancer and cow's milk and other milk products. The scientist, Ganmaa Davaasambuu, M.D., Ph.D., a native Mongolian, noted that ingestion of natural estrogens from cows (particularly from pregnant cows) in milk may be linked to breast, prostate, and testicular cancers in humans. All are "hormone-dependent" tumors, meaning that they need sex hormones to grow.

Dr. Davaasambuu cited a study comparing diet and cancer rates in 42 countries that showed a strong correlation between milk and cheese consumption and the incidence of testicular cancer among men age 20 to 39 - rates were highest in high consuming countries such as Switzerland and Denmark and low in Algeria and other parts of the world where people eat less dairy. She also linked rising rates of dairy consumption to the increased death rates from prostate cancer (from near zero per 100,000 men five decades ago to seven per 100,000 men today) and noted that breast cancer also appears to be linked to milk and cheese consumption.

Dr. Davaasambuu emphasized that natural estrogens are 100,000 times more potent than environmental estrogens and that today's cow's milk is particularly rich in them. The principal reason is that dairy farmers now milk their cows about 300 days per year. For much of that time the cows are pregnant, and as pregnancy progresses, the estrogen content of their milk increases. According to Dr. Davaasambuu milk from cows in the late stage of pregnancy can contain up to 33 times as much of the hormone estrone as milk from non-pregnant cows.

In the United States, skim milk (as opposed to whole or two percent milk) has the lowest levels of hormones. That's not surprising because hormones are fat soluble. In this respect, skim milk is much like milk in Mongolia where cows are milked for only five months a year and not in the late stages of their pregnancy. Another of Dr. Davaasambuu's studies showed increased hormone levels among Mongolian third-graders after a month of drinking commercial milk from the United States.

Among women, milk consumption has been associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer in both the Nurses' Health Study and in a 2005 study from Sweden's Karolinska Institute. (On the other hand, 2002 data from the Nurses' Health Study showed that the more low-fat dairy products premenopausal women consumed, the lower their breast cancer risk. This didn't hold true for post-menopausal women, and the lower risk among pre-menopausal women didn't continue after they reached menopause.)

Organic milk is better in many respects than conventional milk but still may be full of natural hormones. My advice: cut down on dairy products except low-fat ones. Substitute soy milk for cow's milk when possible

Vitamin A and D fortified skim milk is most certainly available in CA.

Most milk in the United States is fortified but this wasn't the question being asked. I have also been on such a search for enriched skim milk. This is skim milk that has added calcium and some other minerals added to it. Generally 2x more calcium then regular milks. It is thicker and made white so it is more visually pleasing.

It tastes better then normal skim milk, much the same as 2% milk and is great eaten on cereal unlike watery tasting skim milk. In Fresno and other surrounding areas I have not seen it. Call or write to your local milk producing dairy and ask them to add this to their product line.

If there are enough letters to folks like Producer's in Fresno they might be open to starting this line of products. Enriched Skim milk tastes great and you can feel good about drinking it. It is an easy way to get rid of saturated fats and cholesterol. It is a great nutritional choice. If only California Dairies would would let Californian's get as happy as the cows by letting us have this choice. Great question!