In the context of utilitarianism, the Reproductive Health (RH) bill would likely be viewed as promoting the greatest happiness or well-being for the greatest number of people by providing access to reproductive health services. Its emphasis on reducing maternal and infant mortality, providing contraception, and promoting education could align with utilitarian principles of maximizing overall welfare and minimizing suffering in society.

The Catholic Church is against the RH bill because it promotes the use of artificial contraception, which goes against the church's teachings on the sanctity of life and the importance of natural family planning methods. The church advocates for the protection of life from conception, and believes that artificial contraception interferes with this principle.

The Reproductive Health (RH) Bill, now the Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Act in the Philippines, has sparked debates among Catholics due to its provisions on contraception and family planning, which some see as conflicting with religious teachings. Some Catholic leaders have opposed the bill, stating that it goes against the teachings of the Church regarding family planning and contraception. However, supporters argue that the bill promotes reproductive health, women's rights, and responsible parenthood.

The religious group may have rejected the RH bill due to beliefs that certain provisions, such as contraception and family planning, conflict with their religious teachings on the sanctity of life and reproductive ethics. They may have concerns about the moral implications and potential impact on traditional values.

Christians may disagree on the Reproductive Health (RH) Bill due to differing interpretations of their faith teachings regarding contraception, family planning, and human life. Some may view the bill as promoting contraception and abortion, which they believe goes against their religious beliefs. Others may support the bill as a means to improve access to reproductive health services and empower individuals to make informed choices about their health and family planning.

Some of the problems the church sees in relation to the Reproductive Health (RH) Bill include concerns about moral implications, such as the promotion of contraception, which goes against Catholic teachings on procreation. The church also raises issues about the potential impact on family values and the sanctity of life that they believe could be undermined by the bill. Additionally, there are concerns about the separation of church and state, as the church believes that the bill may infringe on religious freedom by compelling institutions to provide services or information that conflict with their beliefs.

No, i don't agree in it , because RH bill is unconstitutional and will direct scarce resources to national spending on artificial contraceptives that will be harmful to women and the family in the long term. What it proposes are band-aid or stop-gap measures, supposedly to help alleviate poverty when the better solution should be to provide education and employment opportunities to the people. The only one who will benefit should the RH bill be passed are its proponents. Pushing for contraception on a national level by government officials could very well lead to corruption.

not making a child born, making the mother harder task to have.. :)

Because of the unwanted pregnancy and the increase in the rate of the population, the government try to imposed the RH Bill in the Philippines in which to decrease the population size and at the same time reduced the number of people in the family. However I assumed that the government does not know how to create the employment for the people of the nation so they decided to introduced the bill.

NO