Theocracy

Fundamentalist theocracy is a form of government where religious leaders or institutions hold ultimate authority, and laws are based on a strict interpretation of religious texts. This system often limits individual freedoms and rights, as well as restricts the role of secular institutions in governance. Examples include the Taliban regime in Afghanistan and the Islamic Republic of Iran.

No, Afghanistan is not a theocracy. It is officially an Islamic republic with elements of democracy in its government structure. Islamic law does influence governance and society in Afghanistan, but it is not a fully theocratic state.

NO. A theocracy is a country that is directly ruled by either (1) a person who claims to be a god or (2) a person who claims to be able to determine the will of the gods. In this case, the religious authority is himself writing the laws of the country and enforcing them. A secular country is one in which religion and the state remain entirely separate from one another and do not interfere in each other's affairs.

A theocracy is a form of government where religious leaders have direct authority over the state's laws and politics. In a theocracy, the government is typically guided by religious principles and officials are often religious leaders who enforce laws based on their interpretations of religious texts.

Theocracies, where religious leaders hold political power, can be found in countries like Iran (Islamic Republic), Vatican City (Roman Catholic Church), and Saudi Arabia (Islamic Sharia law). Some regions within countries, such as parts of Afghanistan and Somalia, also operate under theocratic rule based on Islamic law.

Advantages of theocracy include a clear moral framework for governance, the potential for strong community cohesion through shared religious beliefs, and the ability to make decisions based on religious principles. It also allows for the integration of religious teachings into legal and political systems.

In a theocracy, crime is typically addressed based on religious laws and principles. Punishments may be determined by religious leaders or scriptures, and could involve forms of retribution, rehabilitation, or repentance. Theocracy may also prioritize promoting moral behavior and preventing crime through religious teachings and governance.

two thirds of they made him god and one one third man - APEX

Martin Luther may have had mixed feelings about the Calvinist theocracy in Geneva. While he may have appreciated the emphasis on religious purity and discipline, he may have also been concerned about the strict control over individual freedoms and the potential for abuse of power within a theocratic government.

Martin Luther would likely have had mixed feelings about the Calvinist theocracy in Geneva. On one hand, Luther believed in the authority of secular rulers, so he may have appreciated the strict governance in Geneva. However, he also valued individual conscience and freedom, so he may have been uncomfortable with the level of control exerted by the Calvinists.

In a theocracy, power is typically acquired through religious authority. The leaders are usually religious figures, such as priests or religious scholars, and they are believed to have a divine mandate to govern. The power is often maintained through strict adherence to religious laws and enforcing religious doctrines.

In a theocracy, a leader typically becomes a leader through religious or divine appointment. This means that their authority and power are believed to derive directly from a higher power or deity. The specific process of how a leader is chosen can vary depending on the religious beliefs and practices of a particular theocratic system. It may involve rituals, consultations with religious authorities, or direct divine revelation.

Theocratic governments generally make up their own laws based on what their religious beliefs are. For example, inside the walls of the Holy See (the Vatican), Theocratic laws are utilized. An even more accurate term for the latter's form of government would be an ecclesiocracy - being ruled by the church.

Iran has a theocracy government, with the Supreme Leader serving as the highest authority and holding significant power over both the government and the Islamic religious establishment. The government is based on the principles of Velayat-e faqih (Guardianship of the Islamic Jurist), with religious leaders exercising control and influence over legislative, executive, and judicial functions.

"A theocracy is like a government intertwined with religious authority, similar to a priest ruling a kingdom."

A puritan theocracy is a form of government in which leaders who adhere to strict puritan beliefs hold both political and religious authority. Laws and policies are based on puritan teachings and principles, with a strong emphasis on moral behavior and conformity to religious doctrine.

• Freedom of religion

• Freedom of speech

• 21 or older can vote

In a theocracy, everything is run by the religious hierarchy. (Technically, it's run by God, but He doesn't seem to take much interest in the day-to-day politics.) So if you wish to participate in the theocracy, you must become part of the religious structure, and attain some power or status in that structure.

The only functioning theocracies in this era are Islamic, such as the Islamic Republic of Iran. Not even Saudi Arabia is a real theocracy.

It is called a theocracy.

An atheocracy is an atheist or non-religious state.

Answer this que A theocracy uses religious beliefs as a basis for laws, whereas an absolute monarchy may have nonreligious laws. stion…

Iran, the Vatican.

Direct Theocracy: A direct theocracy is a country that is directly ruled by either (1) a person who claims to be a god or (2) a person who claims to be able to determine the will of the gods. In this case, the religious authority is himself writing the laws of the country and enforcing them. A version of type one would be Ancient Egypt, where the Pharaoh was considered to be a god, and who ruled based on this religious right. A version of type two would be the Islamic Republic of Iran. Iran is a theocracy because the Ayatollahs are all clergy of the Twelver Shiite Islam religion. Although Iran has an elected parliament, who can run in the elections (and often the results) are controlled by the non-elected Supreme Council of Ayatollahs.

Indirect Theocracy: An indirect theocracy is a country where direct power is in the hands of a non-religious authority, but incredibly amounts of power to determine policy come from (1) a person who claims to be a god or (2) a person who claims to be able to determine the will of the gods. The difference here is that the religious authorities are not actually ones writing the government's laws, but instead have strong influence on how they are to be determined. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is considered an indirect theocracy, because it is actually absolute monarchy where the Saudi King does not have religious authority, but the Wahhabi Councils, which do have religious authority, have strong influence with the Saudi King and in public policy.

A theocracy is a form of government in which religious leaders hold political authority, and the state's legal system is based on religious law. In a theocracy, the governance and laws are often derived from sacred texts, and leaders are believed to be divinely inspired or appointed. This system can lead to a close intertwining of religious and state affairs, impacting various aspects of society, including law, education, and public policy. Examples of theocracies include Iran and the Vatican City.