People often refer to the internet as a form of media because it serves as a platform for the dissemination and consumption of information, news, and entertainment. Unlike traditional media, the Internet allows for interactive communication, enabling users to engage, share, and create content. It encompasses various formats, including text, video, and audio, and provides instant access to a vast array of sources. This democratization of information has transformed how we perceive and interact with media today.
Mostly all people dont have internet. we can say most of the people have internet.
its people on the internet right?... well the internet lies.
You say 'the people are'. The word people is the plural form of person.
If the government says something contradictory to that said in the media, the media can claim it as a coverup while the government can only say the media is misleading the people. However, the media usually tells people what they want to hear and thus people are more likely to agree with them against the government.
SAY Media was created in 2005.
That the Internet gives people equal chances to contribute to collective knowledge
I would say that it is doing research ...any kind of research..and doing it on the internet vs. a library ..The internet is mass media ...or displaying the research on the internet The only other would be TV...and so its definitely on the web or TV and research is research...what kind of research...i dont know...its not research of the mass media...so its got to be research done or diplayed or both ....on mass media.
Many people say yes, but others are not so sure. There are certainly people who use the popular media (Twitter, Facebook, etc) to network and remain informed about what is going on in the world. In some countries, new technology has absolutely helped people to organize demonstrations and protests, or send out messages to journalists or upload photos to Youtube. But on the other hand, in some countries, the government can easily shut down the internet, making it more complicated for dissenters to communicate. Further, in some countries, only the very rich or upper class have access to the internet. So, while it is true that revolts in Egypt and Tunisia were advanced by people who were able to use the internet, the majority of the population did not have access. They took to the streets and protested with or without social media. It definitely can be shown that popular media like Twitter (or even older media like radio) can inspire and motivate a group of people, or help them to plan and organize; but it is also true that in most countries, revolutions are brought about by many factors, not just social media.
It is a form of government that is based on the people's say.
That's because a website is functioning over the internet and that means that the market and place for the website is the internet.
LOTS of people listen, watch, or read the media and if you were to put good things about you and you want somebody to vote for you their is more of a probability you will win if you say the good things about your self in the media!
By Blocking them