wikipedia .com
Its considered a Non credible website because anyone can answer the questions you asked and might give you the wrong answer
Credible is believable, based on information or fact; not credible is not believable because it may be based on opinion, a biased source, and contain little actual information or fact.
Finding information from credible sources is important because it ensures the accuracy and reliability of the information. Credible sources are more likely to have undergone rigorous fact-checking and adhere to high standards of accuracy, giving you confidence in the information you are using. Additionally, using credible sources helps prevent the spread of misinformation or fake news.
Wiki isn't a credible source, because, it doesn't really give off correct information.
because its not healthy and does not grow in the ground
Ehow is not considered a highly credible source because it relies on user-generated content that may not be vetted for accuracy or expertise. It lacks the rigorous editorial standards and fact-checking processes that are common in more reputable sources. It is generally not recommended for obtaining reliable information.
Credible means believable. He was found guilty because the jury did not think is story was credible.
If a source is biased, it provides information which is slanted one way or another. It isn't a credible source because it isn't presenting the facts in a straight-forward manner.
Credible means believable. He was found guilty because the jury did not think is story was credible.
Someone with a lengthy criminal background may be considered non-credible. Non-credible means the finder of facts (generally the jury) would not believe the witness's testimony. This could be because of a criminal background, a history of deception, or because of his/her own interest in the outcome of the case. For example, if the witness has a relationship with the defendant, his alibi that he was with the defendant at the time that the crime was committed may not be credible.
government sites are credible because it's the government's outlet.
A thief may not be considered a credible witness due to their criminal background and potential motives to lie or manipulate the truth. Their credibility could be called into question during legal proceedings.