0
What else can I help you with?
Which best explains the difference between an explanation and an argument?
An explanation provides information, while an argument uses evidence to support a claim.
Which of the following is a poor strategy for linking evidence to your ideas in an argument?
Simply stating evidence without explaining how it supports your ideas is a poor strategy for linking evidence to your ideas in an argument. It is important to clearly articulate the connection between the evidence presented and the argument being made to persuade your audience effectively.
What information did Wegner need to strengthen his argument?
Wegner needed evidence of a mechanism by which continents could move, data supporting the idea of past and present continental positions, geological similarities between continents, and paleoclimatic evidence to strengthen his argument for continental drift.
Why is DNA the weakest evidence of evolution?
Actually, it is the strongest evidence for evolution. Without one fossil we would know from the DNA evidence that evolution has occurred and is occurring. It is in the DNA of organisms that we see the strongest evidence for common ancestry. The products of those genes are sometimes highly conserved down the ages. Ribosomes, the workbenches on which proteins are made, differ hardly at at between you and pets.
Which two elements should be used in the right proportion to build an effective argument?
Logic and evidence are the two key elements that should be used in the right proportion to build an effective argument. Logic helps to structure the argument and ensure it is coherent and rational, while evidence provides support for the claims made within the argument. Finding the right balance between these elements is crucial for crafting a persuasive and compelling argument.
What happened during the temper temper incident?
During the temper temper incident, there was a heated argument between two individuals that escalated into a physical altercation.
Has the big bang theory become an argument of semantics?
The Big Bang theory can be debated by some based on semantics, as understanding and interpreting the terminology and concepts involved can vary between individuals. However, the overall theory itself, which describes the expansion of the universe from a singularity, is supported by extensive observational evidence.
What is the strongest a correlation could be?
Either +1 (strongest possible positive correlation between the variables) or -1 (strongest possible negativecorrelation between the variables).
What are the differences between the fact and evidence?
A fact is an objective truth or reality that can be proven or verified. Evidence, on the other hand, is information or data that supports a claim or proposition. Facts are concrete and incontrovertible, while evidence is used to establish the truth of a statement or argument.
In a group discussion which best describes one of the primary purposes of synthesizing claims and evidence?
One primary purpose of synthesizing claims and evidence in a group discussion is to create a cohesive and well-supported argument or perspective. By combining relevant claims and evidence, individuals can build a stronger and more convincing case to support their point of view. This process also helps in drawing connections between different pieces of information and strengthening the overall message being conveyed.
How can you write a sentence using the word argument?
There was an argument between ?? and ??.
What is an illogical argument?
An illogical argument is one in which the premise does not logically lead to the conclusion. This can involve making invalid connections between the evidence and the conclusion, or using flawed reasoning that does not follow the rules of logic. It often leads to unsupported or unreasonable conclusions.
