answersLogoWhite

0

Although Wikipedia is right 99% of the time, it can be easily user edited so some things may not be completely correct. Often times you'll find that dates are different for the same event listed on a different page, and this is because anyone can change something.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What information website is not considered to be credible because anyone can post anonymously?

wikipedia .com


Is scholastic credible or not credible?

Scholastic is generally considered a credible source, especially in the context of educational materials for children and young adults. However, as with any source, it is always recommended to verify information independently from multiple sources.


Is Elsevier a credible source for academic research?

Yes, Elsevier is generally considered a credible source for academic research due to its reputation as a leading publisher of scientific and scholarly journals.


Is wiki a great source?

I am a Professor of Medicine at Harvard University, and my students have been using Wikipedia for years. It is a very credible and good source. Not to mention but that its a great and a reliable source.


What criteria determine what is considered a credible source?

Criteria that determine a credible source include the author's expertise, the publication's reputation, the presence of citations and references, and the accuracy and objectivity of the information presented.


Why can't Wikipedia be used as a credible source in academic writing?

Wikipedia is considered a reliable source because each article must undergo a rigorous review process, with many professional reviewers involved. Is the ideal place to start your research and get a global picture of a topic. Is always good check the facts we find in Wikipedia against other sources but Wikipedia is as accurate or more accurate than more traditional encyclopedias.


Is Wikipedia credible?

Wikipedia can be credible if the editor cited beyond the page but if the information is not cited the information may or may not be correct.


Can you cite Wikipedia as a source in your research paper?

No, it is generally not recommended to cite Wikipedia as a source in a research paper because it is not considered a reliable or scholarly source.


Is it acceptable to cite Wikipedia as a source in my research paper?

It is generally not acceptable to cite Wikipedia as a source in a research paper because it is not considered a reliable or scholarly source.


Is a book considered an academic source?

Yes, a book can be considered an academic source if it is written by a credible author and contains well-researched information that is relevant to the topic being studied.


What does credidle mean?

It seems like there is a typo in your question. If you meant to ask about "credible," it means able to be believed or trusted. A credible source is one that is considered reliable and trustworthy.


Is MDPI a credible source for academic research?

MDPI is generally considered a credible source for academic research, as it is a reputable publisher with a peer-review process for its articles. However, it is always important to critically evaluate the quality and reliability of individual articles regardless of the source.