To me i think sprint is better than Verizon.
Verizon has a greater reception rate then sprint. considering the service provider is what affects the reception received by a cellular device, no the sprint 8300 doesn't not have better reception then the Verizon envy 2.
Sprint.
Yes Sprint offer better wireless coverage then Verizon. Sprint has a ntwork that covers every corner of the country.
If you are looking for a cheaper plan than you should go with Sprint. If you want better relabilty in service plan then you should choose Verizon
Verizon all the way. My friend has sprint and it SUCKS. Theres barley anything you can do with it. Dont listen to cheesy commercials.
Verizon is better because at@t charges you stuff that you don't even do and i have been with Verizon since 2005 and that's it
When comparing the coverage maps for both Verizon and Sprint, it appears that Sprint covers more of the United States than Verizon, and therefore would be a better option if you are looking for coverage. Also, when comparing Verion's 4G data coverage to that of Sprint, Sprint also comes out on top, and therefore Sprint would be the better option.
It depends on where you are located. According to pcmag.com, after testing AT&T, Verizon and Sprint, they found that AT&T has the fastest system and it roams in Europe, but in the U.S., Verizon and Sprint actually have better coverage. Verizon's system is almost as fast for downloads as AT&T and has better coverage in the United States.
T-Mobile because their prices are cheaper!
When I was in Daniels, I had a better signal than my friends with sprint phones. I have been a verizon customer for the past two years and they have done me well.
Verizon exceeds sprint, it provides FiOS & Verizon Broadband Services offer blazing speed & crystal clarity of the 100% fiber optic Fios network & proven reliability for their TV, Internet & phone products that will exceed your expectations today & keep you connected down the road here’s good deal with verizon with cash back: cutt.ly/Uh2mhv4