Most Roman slaves never learned to read or write, those that did were either taught by another educated slave, or their master sent them to a Gramaticus (school) to learn. Also some slaves were teachers.
no he wasnt he couldnt read nor could he write ! :)
Most slaves were illiterate, so the question is not answerable in large part. Those who were literate would use the same technologies that their masters had access to.
learning how to write, read. those are two they couldn't learn how to do.
Slaves did not know anything, because they didn't get the education to write or read. Thus, making their lives diffucult. Most slaves would probably know how to farm, mine, and build, because they did those things for a living.
Frederick Douglass' "Learning to Read and Write" was shown to an audience of white males because at the time, many women and slaves were not literate. His purpose in writing this was to show slaves that if they learned to read and write they could better themselves.
In some civilizations, it was illegal for slaves to be literate, while in others, some slaves were able to learn how to read and write. The ability to read and write among slaves varied widely depending on the time period, location, and individual circumstances.
because the children couldnt either: write neatly or they messed about or they was naughty or late to school
No they were not. The slaveholders were scared that once their slaves would learn how to read and write, they would write letters to other slaves with ideas of how to escape the the plantation
Few slaves could write down their experiences.
He was late beacause he couldnt make it.Odysseus said he had more important stuff to do.
House slaves cooked and cleaned, and got rather better food than field slaves. Some house slaves were lucky enough to be taught to read and write by the wives or mothers.They also had better living conditions.