0
Historically, Myanmar has been under military rule since 1962. It is a Dictatorship in which no one has the right to vote and they have a very miserably life . In the 1970s, the military government brutally suppressed student protests at leading Burmese Academic Institutions. In the late 1980s, there was increasing pressure from the Burmese people for more democratic reforms. In May of 1990, there was a free and fair election that led to the NLD (National League for Democracy) winning 80% of the vote and the parliament seats. However, the military government refused to accept the results, imprisoned the NLD leader, Aung San Suu Kyi, in her own home, and strengthened their grip on power. This effectively served as a refusal of the people's demands.
Starting in 2007, the situation began to change. In 2007, monks protested the actions of the government in what became known as the Saffron Revolution. Although the Myanmar government violently repressed the incident, it had wide international coverage and served to further isolate Myanmar. In 2008, there was a constitutional referendum to push the country closer to democracy and in 2012, the NLD won 43 out of 45 vacant seats in the Burmese Parliament. It is unclear why the Myanmar government is taking this pro-democracy stance, but NLD leaders like Aung San Suu Kyi are using it as best they can to influence policy. Ms. Suu Kyi is currently the Leader of the Opposition in the Lower House of the Myanmar Parliament and no longer under house arrest.
What else can I help you with?
How do the existing rulers react to people's demands in Egypt?
n
How do the existing rulers react to people's demands in India?
if the rulers are good and have the thought to help people then they will try or rulers will complete their right wishes and if rulers are bad they will not complete people wishes or they will complete by taking bribe from people
How do the existing rulers of Syria react to peoples demands?
By killing them by tanks and aircraft.. Bashar Assad is a dictator.
How do the exsiting rulers react to people demands?
Existing rulers often respond to public demands in various ways, depending on the political context and their level of authority. Some may engage in dialogue and implement reforms to address grievances, aiming to maintain stability and legitimacy. Others might resort to repression, using force or censorship to suppress dissent and maintain control. Ultimately, the reaction can range from conciliatory to authoritarian, influenced by the rulers' perception of threats to their power.
HOW DO EXISTING RULERS REACT TO PEOPLE'S DEMAND IN Cuba?
In Cuba, existing rulers often respond to people's demands with a mix of repression and limited reforms. The government maintains strict control over dissent, using censorship and surveillance to suppress opposition. At the same time, it occasionally implements gradual economic reforms to address public discontent, such as allowing more private enterprise, but these changes are typically tightly regulated. Overall, the regime prioritizes stability and control over substantial political concessions.
How do existing rulers react to peoples demands in north Korea?
In North Korea, existing rulers, particularly the Kim regime, typically respond to public demands with suppression rather than concession. The government maintains strict control over information and dissent, often using propaganda to promote loyalty and suppress any dissenting voices. When faced with public discontent, the regime may increase its repressive measures, including arrests and punishments for perceived dissent, rather than addressing the underlying issues. This approach aims to maintain the regime's power and prevent any challenges to its authority.
How do the existing rulers react to people's demands in non-democratic countries?
The question as posed gives no specifics on the country in question. As a result. It is impossible to give any decent answer. Every country responds to its citizens differently. Some are very motivated to satisfy the plebiscite's demands, some are very motivated to crush all dissent, and others are entirely indifferent.
How do the existing rulers react to the demand of people in a non democratic country?
Usually by trying to forcibly suppress any signs of opposition.
According to daoists how should rulers behave?
Rulers should show how good they are to there people because the people get there character from there rulers, and maybe the people might do some bad to them if the rulers don't treat then very good.
How are the rulers in Libya picked?
The rulers of libya are picked by the nominations from the people.
What rights did ancient Egyptian people have?
People living under the Pharaohs basically had no rights as we know them. The rulers were absolute rulers.
How do the existing rulers of north Korea react to peoples demand?
The existing rulers of North Korea, particularly the Kim regime, typically respond to public demands with repression and propaganda rather than genuine reform. They maintain strict control over information and expression, often using surveillance and harsh penalties to stifle dissent. When faced with unrest or dissatisfaction, the regime may also employ displays of military strength or nationalistic rhetoric to divert attention and rally support. Overall, the response is characterized by a focus on maintaining power and suppressing any challenges to the regime's authority.
