answersLogoWhite

0

Colonists in Pennsylvania, particularly under William Penn's leadership, generally adopted a more conciliatory approach towards Native Americans, emphasizing treaties and coexistence. This led to relatively peaceful relations and mutual cooperation in trade. In contrast, Massachusetts colonists often viewed Native Americans through a lens of suspicion and conflict, leading to violent confrontations, such as King Philip's War. Thus, while Pennsylvania's settlers sought harmony, those in Massachusetts frequently engaged in aggressive expansion and conflict.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

6d ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

How would you contrast the way colonists in Pennsylvania and in Massachusetts along with native Americans?

dear


How would you contrast the way colonists in Pennsylvania and in Massachusetts got along with Native Americans?

dear


What contrast does John Smith draw between the other colonists and himself?

In John Smith's writings about himself, he often drew a contrast between himself and the other colonists. He portrayed himself as being more resourceful, competent, and capable of adapting to the new environment compared to the other colonists.


Compare and contrast thesis statement?

A thesis statement could compare and contrast just about anything. For example, a thesis could compare and contrast the education of young African Americans in 1950.


Compare and contrast African-Americans and Hispanic Americans?

what is the presence of Hispanics in the judiciary system in the united states what is the presence of Hispanics in the judiciary system in the united states


Compare and contrast the different views of African Americans toward the Revolutionary war?

i think the answer was that African Americans could choose what sides to be on. and that's all i think the answer is (:


In contrast to the chesapeake bay colonists those in New England?

enjoyed longer lives and more stable families. -zack get attt me nukkkaa ;))


What consequence did religious toleration in Quaker-dominated Pennsylvania have for colonists?

Religious toleration in Quaker-dominated Pennsylvania fostered a diverse and pluralistic society, attracting various religious groups seeking refuge from persecution. This environment encouraged peaceful coexistence and collaboration among different communities, contributing to a culture of mutual respect and dialogue. However, it also led to tensions with neighboring colonies that maintained stricter religious and social hierarchies, creating a contrast between Pennsylvania's inclusive policies and the more rigid systems of governance elsewhere. Ultimately, this commitment to religious freedom helped shape Pennsylvania's identity as a haven for liberty and democratic ideals.


Why was this settlement in Jamestown considered a success while the one in Roanoke island was a failure?

The settlement in Jamestown was considered a success because it eventually prospered due to successful tobacco cultivation and trade with Native Americans. In contrast, the settlement in Roanoke Island failed due to the mysterious disappearance of the colonists and lack of sufficient resources.


Compare and contrast African American and Asian Americans?

add Conor boylan on fb for sexy time


American colonists who were determined to fight the British until American independence was won?

Before and during the American Revolution, those American colonists who were determined to fight the British until independence was won were known as Patriots. By contrast, the Loyalists were those colonists who remained loyal to the British Crown, while quite a number of other colonists did not take sides in the conflict.


Malcolm X provided a new voice for African Americans that stood in contrast to Martin Luther King's message?

Nonviolent message