0
What else can I help you with?
Why the Missouri Compromise line did not provide a solution to the problem of California's statehood?
Because California was in both the north and south.
What problem did the Missouri compromise attempt to resolve?
missori became slave state, and manie became free state and gave a solution to slavery
Was the Missouri Compromise of 1850 more favorable for the North or the South?
Basically the Missouri Compromise of 1850 was a fair compromise. One problem for Northern abolitionists was that the Compromise ushered in the Fugitive Slave Act. They were outraged that the new compromise included this law.
What problem did some northerners have with the Kansas-Nebraska Act?
It violated the Missouri Compromise.
Did the Missouri Compromise increase unity or division?
The Missouri Compromise was a temporary band aid on the problem of slavery. Many in the South wanted slavery and many in the North did not. It made more people unhappy.
Why did the Missouri compromise line not solve the problem of California's statehood?
California was in both the north and south.
What was the solution to the problem of representation at the conventioon called?
The solution to the problem of representation at the convention was the creation of the Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise. This compromise established a bicameral legislature with a House of Representatives based on population size and a Senate with equal representation for each state.
The role of missouri compromise in self-governing society?
im pretty sure LAW is #1 problem.
What problem did the Missouri Compromise solve?
Wht two things did the missiori compromise solve
Creative title for an essay suicide attempt?
A Permanent Solution for a Temporary Problem
What does Giving up is a permanent solution to a temporary problem mean?
It basically means that whatever problem you're facing will not last forever; if you press on and persevere, you will eventually come to the end of it. The problem is temporary. However, if you give up, the problem has won. Giving up is a permanent solution because it ends the contest.
How did US Senator Stephen A Douglas characterize the Missouri Compromise of 1850?
Senator Stephen A. Douglas put forth the argument that if the Missouri Compromise of 1850 really was a compromise, it had to put forward a consistent principle. If it did not then it was not a compromise, but instead a modus vivendi arrangement. The main problem of this characterization is that Douglas was asking a rhetorical question. Douglas was the one to know inasmuch as he helped put it together.
