0
What else can I help you with?
Ataturk's reforms in Turkey lead him to what?
Ataturks reforms in turkey led him to ?
What was mustafa ataturks contribution to modern turkey?
Ataturk modernized Turkey, introduced many reforms that westernized nation including introducing the use of surname, forbidding women from wearing the veil and men from wearing the fez, secularized Turkey- eliminating Islamic law from gov't
What were the nationalists reactions to O'Neills 5 point reforms?
Establishment of a commission to run LondonderryChanges in housing policylimited voting reformsfuture reviews of emergency legislation
The National Assembly felt the Paris Commune was?
The National Assembly viewed the Paris Commune as a threat to their authority and feared its radical reforms and independence. They saw the Commune's actions as a challenge to the established order and sought to suppress it.
Why was rowlatt act passed?
The Rowlatt act was passed by the British in order to suppress nationalists who refused to be satisfied by official reforms and to keep a check on revolutionary terrorism.
Why did political support for New Deal reforms decline?
some members of congress thought artist promoted radical values
What was athens like under the care of peisistratus?
Under the care of Peisistratos, Athens experienced radical reforms because he championed for the rights of the lower class of Athens.
Why was lord durham known as radical jack?
Lord Durham was known as Radical Jack due to his progressive views and bold reforms, particularly during his time as Governor General of Canada. He advocated for responsible government and greater autonomy for the colonies, earning him the nickname among his supporters. His radical approach to governance and push for political change made him a key figure in Canadian history.
Why do you think congress described the Montague chelmsford reforms asInadequateunsatisfactory and disappointing?
Congress described the Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms as inadequate, unsatisfactory, and disappointing because they fell short of the Indian nationalists' demands for greater self-governance and autonomy. The reforms introduced limited legislative councils and retained significant power in British hands, failing to address key issues like full self-rule or substantial political representation for Indians. This led to widespread disillusionment among Indian leaders and the populace, who sought more meaningful reforms to address their aspirations for independence.
What role did the Zwickau Prophets play in the early years of the Protestant Reformation?
The Zwickau Prophets were radical preachers who influenced early leaders of the Protestant Reformation, such as Thomas Mntzer and Andreas Karlstadt. They advocated for more extreme reforms and challenged the authority of the Catholic Church, contributing to the spread of radical ideas within the movement.
France was better off with Robespierre and the radical Jacobin's in charge or Napoleon?
The assessment of whether France was better off under Robespierre and the radical Jacobins or Napoleon depends on the perspective one takes. The Jacobins aimed for radical egalitarian reforms and the establishment of a republic, but their reign was marked by violence, repression, and the Reign of Terror. In contrast, Napoleon brought stability, legal reforms through the Napoleonic Code, and expanded France’s influence across Europe, but at the cost of authoritarian rule and continuous warfare. Ultimately, while the Jacobins pursued lofty ideals, Napoleon's leadership may have provided more lasting institutional changes and stability.
What religious reforms occurred in Zurich as part of the Zwingli reformation?
The religious reforms in Zurich only went so far as the political support in the city would permit. This allowed the new Reformed church to displace the Roman Catholic as the state church. There were significant changes made, however, the full radical program which Zwingli may have initially supported was not.
