Because at that time Great Britain was a colonial power that saw burma and the far east in general as connected to its main colony, India.
In view of David Cameron's visit to Burma and the west in general's 'sucking up' to the military junta my best guess is a share in the abundant Natural Resources of that gentle country.
France took control of the Vietnamese in response to Britain's movement in Burma.
France took control of the Vietnamese in response to Britain's movement in Burma.
France took control of the Vietnamese in response to Britain's movement in Burma.
France took control of the Vietnamese in response to Britain's movement in Burma.
The Vietnamese
1671
Burma, now called Myanmar, in mainland, Southeast Asia.
Internal conflict in Burma happened in 1948-04.
France took control of Vietnam in response to the growing influence of Britain and the for in movement in Burma during the 19th century. The French aimed to expand their colonial presence in Southeast Asia and counter British expansionism, leading to the establishment of French Indochina. This move was part of a broader trend of European powers competing for control over territories in Asia during the colonial era.
His defeat of Charles I's forces allowed him to control England and have it follow the Commonwealth. He became a highly regarded official, "Lord Protector", and extended his influence to Scotland and Ireland.
go read a book and not be lazy you stupid bum, just kidding 1957
King Henry