answersLogoWhite

0

Critics argue that India's rule over Kashmir lacks legitimacy due to the region's disputed status following the 1947 partition of India and Pakistan, which gave rise to conflicting claims over Kashmir. The region's accession to India was conditional and hinged on a plebiscite that has never been conducted, leading many to view India's governance as an imposition rather than a legitimate claim. Additionally, widespread human rights abuses and the suppression of local dissent have further undermined the perceived legitimacy of India's control. Consequently, many Kashmiris and international observers advocate for self-determination as a more legitimate resolution to the conflict.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1mo ago

What else can I help you with?