Athens
A city-state located on flat, open terrain without natural barriers such as mountains or rivers would be more open to attack in a military battle. Additionally, a city-state located near coastlines or trade routes may also be more vulnerable to attack due to easy access for invaders by sea.
Sparta had no walls, relying on it's warriors as its walls.
Athens was on the coast, so was open to surprise seaborne attack. Sparta was inland and could have warning of and prepare for a land attack. However there were other factors: Athens was walled, could therefore be defended by a small force, and being connected by walls to its seaport, could import food when under siege. It could also send out an expedition by sea to attack it's attacker's home city while that city's army was besieging Athens.. Sparta was unwalled and had to be defended by land battle in the open, so it depended on the army being home and strong enough to see off an attacker. Sparta also had a large serf population nearby and was vulnerable to an uprising.
Athens
Because
Athens offered a more diverse culture with a focus on arts, education, and democracy, while Sparta was more militaristic and regimented. Athens had a more open and inclusive society, while Sparta's strict social structure and focus on warfare may have limited personal freedoms for its citizens. Overall, the emphasis on intellectual and cultural pursuits in Athens could be seen as more appealing than the militaristic focus of Sparta.
The 'plays' in Athens were first held in Agora. As they became more popular, more space was needed. So a large open-air Auditorium was built.
yes
If he immediately challenged Ares without opening it he would have died. Athens would have been destroyed and Kratos' dreams would be huanted by is failure.....
they attack aquires when the document is open
Kapil dev was the first Indian captain to open the bowling attack for India.