Is Roe v Wade a case were wrongful due process was used?

Answer 1

Opinion

The answer is a simple yes. The guidelines used to determine the outcome of Roe v. Wade were completely unconstitutional. John Ely wrote in the Yale Law Journal and condemned the outcome "because it is bad constitutional law, or rather because it is not constitutional law and gives almost no sense of an obligation to try to be". Whenever you bring suit to Supreme court, it has to fall under any part of the constitution or be amended to the constitution. Under the constitution you have a "right to life" This means that your life cannot be taken from you, that would be murder. A fetus cannot defend or represent itself and is notcovered under the constitution.

Answer

Actually it wasn't wrongful and covered in the Bill of Rights as right to privacy as the US Supreme Court interpreted it. Quote from Wiki:

Right of Privacy

"Right of a person to be free from intrusion into matters of a personal nature. Although not explicitly mentioned in the U.S. Constitution, a right to privacy has been held to be implicit in . . . providing protection from unwarranted government intrusion into areas such as marriage and contraception. A person's right to privacy may be overcome by a compelling state interest.?

Answer 2

It is generally not considered to be a case where wrongful due process was used. Roe v. Wade was a landmark Supreme Court decision in 1973 that established a woman's constitutional right to have an abortion. The court ruled that a Texas law criminalizing abortion violated a woman's right to privacy, which is within the scope of due process under the Fourteenth Amendment. While the decision has been controversial, it is generally seen as an example of the court properly interpreting and applying due process rights.