Supreme Court decisions involving the First Amendment often center around cases involving free speech, religious expression, and the right to assemble. Notable cases include "Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District," which upheld students' rights to free speech in schools, and "West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette," which protected students' rights to refuse the Pledge of Allegiance on religious grounds. Additionally, decisions like "Citizens United v. FEC" addressed political speech and campaign financing, emphasizing the protection of free expression under the First Amendment.
The Supreme Court is the highest appellate court in the United States. It does not try cases, in the standard sense of the word, but only reviews lower court decisions. Usually, cases heard by the Supreme Court involve issues of Constitutional law or federal legislation.
cash outflows only
Yes. That is usually what they do.
The Supreme Court and other appeals courts usually do not hear any cases that involve issues of fact; instead, they focus on questions of law. These courts primarily review decisions made by lower courts to determine if legal principles were correctly applied. Additionally, they typically avoid cases that are deemed moot or lack a substantial federal question.
That's correct. Congress can't reverse a US Supreme Court ruling, but they can rewrite an overturned law or can initiate a new constitutional amendment (must be ratified by 75% of the states) to override the decision. They usually choose to rewrite the law, because it is extremely difficult to amend the Constitution. For more information, see Related Questions, below.
The "bloodless revolution" usually refers to the Progressive Era of politics in the 1930's and 40's, crowned by the 17th Amendment.
Civil cases have no jail/prison time attached to them. The decisions usually involve money amounts as punitive damages.
Decisions are considered strategic when they involve long-term planning and resource allocation that align with an organization's overarching goals and objectives. These decisions typically shape the direction of the organization and address significant issues that impact its future success. They often require a comprehensive analysis of internal and external environments, as well as a consideration of risks and opportunities. Strategic decisions are usually made by top management and involve a commitment of substantial resources.
There are many decisions that humans are faced with on a daily basis. There are some that are personal decisions whereas there are others that are professional decisions. It is usually advised to consult widely before making certain decisions.
The authority to review the decisions of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces lies with the Supreme Court of the United States. The Supreme Court can choose to hear appeals from this court, typically involving significant questions of law or constitutional issues. Cases are usually taken up through a writ of certiorari, which the Supreme Court grants at its discretion.
Cases the US Supreme Court reviews under its appellate jurisdiction usually involve unresolved or unclear constitutional matters that may have resulted in a Circuit split (different decisions on substantially the same question by two different US Court of Appeals Circuit Courts) or a decision from any lower appellate court that is in opposition to the Supreme Court's constitutional interpretation or to established precedents.
Informal Amendment ProcessThe term "Informal Amendment Process" refers to changes in the interpretation or application of the Constitution by expanding constitutional rights (such as voting) to include groups that were previously excluded. These changes often occur as the result of judicial decisions, usually by the US Supreme Court or by Congressional legislation not struck down as unconstitutional. It is important to note that the "Informal Amendment Process" doesn't actually change the Constitution, just its interpretation, which is in a constant state of flux due to evolving (or devolving) sociopolitical conditions.