Making Plessy change his seat violated his equal rights under the constitution
In Plessy v. Ferguson, Plessy's legal team argued that the Louisiana law mandating racial segregation on public trains violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. They contended that the law enforced a system of racial discrimination that denied African Americans their civil rights and dignity. Additionally, they claimed that the law was inherently unjust and unconstitutional because it treated individuals differently based solely on race. Ultimately, their arguments were rejected by the Supreme Court, which upheld the "separate but equal" doctrine.
In the case of Plessy v. Ferguson, Plessy's legal team argued that Louisiana's Separate Car Act, which required racial segregation on trains, violated the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution. They contended that the law denied Plessy equal protection under the law, as guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment. However, the Supreme Court rejected this argument and upheld the constitutionality of "separate but equal" racial segregation.
homer plessy self respect was compromised by principle of legal equality and marked blacks as inferior
He was the person in the case of plessy v.s Ferguson .And Ferguson won
making plessy change his seat violated his equal rights under the constitution-apex
The decision in Plessy v. Ferguson, (1896) affirmed the "separate but equal" doctrine.
the Plessy v. Ferguson case
brown vs. board of education
Racial segregation was legal.
making plessy change his seat violated his equal rights under the constitution-apex
I think it was Plessy vs Ferguson
"separate but equal"