What is the US Supreme Court's philosophy about not changing social or political policies?

Answer 1

You may be asking about "judicial restraint," a concept that favors upholding Acts of Congress and established precedent. Judicial restraint can be contrasted with "judicial activism," which is sometimes used interchangeably with the phrase "legislating from the bench," a pejorative applied to courts that overturn laws and precedents as unconstitutional.

For more information, see Related Questions, below.

Answer 2

The US Supreme Court's philosophy regarding not changing social or political policies can be understood through its principle of judicial restraint. This philosophy advocates for a limited role of the Court in policymaking, preferring to defer to elected branches of government and maintain the status quo unless there is a clear violation of the Constitution. The Court generally upholds the principle of stare decisis, which means it tends to respect established precedent and avoid unnecessary disruption.