0
What is the difference between the idea of stare decisis and something being unconstitutional?
They are totally unrelated concepts except that they both have to do with jurisprudence. We're talking apples and steel girders here.
Stare Decisis is the principle that a court should follow the precedents set down by previous decisions of that court or of a higher court. A decision of the highest court will be binding on all inferior courts and will be reversed by that highest court only with extreme reluctance. The principle of stare decisis contributes to the certainty of law, sometimes called the rule of law, which is the principle that a citizen should be able to know the legal consequences of his acts before he does them.
Constitutionality and unconstitutionality are principles which apply, not to courts as a rule, but more often to legislators. A constitution is the set of rules which prescribe what legislators can and cannot pass laws or make rules about. In most cases these constitutional rules say which part of the government structure may deal with particular topics. In Britain, for example, the monarch was many centuries ago constitutionally prohibited from instituting taxation; taxes had to be imposed by Parliament. In some cases, constitutions forbid the government from passing laws of a certain type at all. The US Constitution was the first to impose what we might call moral restrictions on its government, in those amendments which are called the "Bill of Rights". Any attempt by a legislator to do something not authorized by the constitution is unconstitutional and void.
What else can I help you with?
Difference between res judicata and stare decisis?
Differences between Res-Judicata and Stare Decisis:There is considerable room for confusion between Res-Judicata and Stare Decisis. Most important differences between Res-Judicata and Stare Decisis are given below:1. Res-Judicata applies to the decision in the discuss, while Stare Decisis operates as to the ruling of law involved.2. Res-Judicata normally binds only the parties and their successors. But Stare Decisis binds to everyone including those who came before the courts in other cases.3. Res-Judicata normally applies to all courts. But Stare Decisis normally applies to high courts and higher courts.4. Res-Judicata takes effect after the time for appealing against a decision in past. But Stare Decisis operates at once.
Star decisis means what in Latin?
star decisis
Can stare decisis be overturned in legal cases?
Yes, stare decisis can be overturned in legal cases. Stare decisis is the principle of following precedent, but higher courts have the authority to overturn previous decisions if they believe it is necessary to do so.
Why is the doctrine of the stare decisis important?
The requirement that a lower court must follow a previously set precedent is called stare decisis.
The habit of using a court's decision in one case as the rule for deciding other cased like it?
stare decisis(NovaNet)
What is the origin of the term stare decisis?
Latin
Let the decision stand?
stare decisis
What country was stare decisis was developed in?
england
When the supreme courts hands down a decision in a case that upholds a previous ruling the justices are said to be following which principle?
Stare Decisis
What part of a court's decision forms the basis of stare decisis?
Only the ratio decidendi is accorded stare decisis status. Everything else is obiter dictum.
What doctrine requires courts to follow authoritative prior decisions when ruling on a case?
This legal doctrine is known as stare decisis, a latin term which means to stand by decisions and not disturb the undisturbed. A prior judicial decision is commonly referred to as a precedent.
What is adherence to a legal precedence called?
Stare decisis
