In Plessy v. Ferguson, Homer Plessy argued that Louisiana's segregation laws violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. He contended that the "separate but equal" doctrine established by the law was inherently discriminatory and stigmatized African Americans. Plessy maintained that racial segregation enforced by the state was a violation of his civil rights, as it marked him as inferior based solely on race. Ultimately, the Supreme Court upheld the segregation laws, solidifying the legality of racial discrimination for decades.
Plessy v. Furguson
The Fourteenth Amendment gave him the right to equal treatment on a train.
Making Plessy change his seat violated his equal rights under the constitution
Plessy's Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendment rights were violated.(ALS)
The Supreme Court decided that Plessy's plan was still treating the negro as if they were being segerated.
In the case of Plessy v. Ferguson, Plessy's legal team argued that Louisiana's Separate Car Act, which required racial segregation on trains, violated the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution. They contended that the law denied Plessy equal protection under the law, as guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment. However, the Supreme Court rejected this argument and upheld the constitutionality of "separate but equal" racial segregation.
Plessy v. Ferguson
making plessy change his seat violated his equal rights under the constitution-apex
Plessy's Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendment rights were violated.(ALS)
Plessy v. Ferguson was a landmark 1896 US Supreme Court decision that upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation under the "separate but equal" doctrine. It legitimized the move in America toward segregation and provided an impetus for pro-segregation legislation (also called Jim Crow laws) across the country.Case Citation:Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 US 537 (1896)
Plessy v. Ferguson (1896),
Plessy's legal team argued that Louisiana's Separate Car Act violated the 13th and 14th Amendments of the Constitution by promoting racial segregation on public transportation, which they believed created unequal treatment under the law. They argued that segregation perpetuated stigma and inequality, rather than promoting equality as intended.