answersLogoWhite

0

Yes, the North eventually gave up its demands for an end to slavery in all territories as part of the Compromise of 1850. This compromise allowed for the possibility of slavery to expand into certain territories while admitting California as a free state. The decision reflected a desire to maintain national unity and avoid conflict over the contentious issue of slavery in the years leading up to the Civil War.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1w ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

The North gave up its demand for an end to slavery in all the territories Congress passed a new?

law


The North gave up its demand for an end to slavery in all the territories Congress passed a new stricter fugitive slave law?

true


What compromise preserved the balance over the issue of slavery between the North and South?

The Missouri compromises reserved the balance over the issue of slavery between the North and the South. This ended with the 1854 Kansas-Nebraska Act, which gave citizens in a territory the right to vote on the slavery issue.


Senator Charles Sumner was an abolitionist who spoke out against slavery on Kansas and the Kansas Nebraska act true or false?

True. Senator Charles Sumner was an abolitionist who strongly opposed slavery. He gave a famous speech condemning the Kansas-Nebraska Act and the extension of slavery into new territories.


How did the North feel about the Fugitive Slave Laws?

North dislike The Fugitive Slave Law, because that did not support slavery, and therefore did not want to send escaped slaves back to the south. North brought the slavery issue to their own doorstep , and gave the runawys a heroic victim status.


The act that ended the Missouri Compromise's restriction on slavery was the?

The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, proposed by Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois, in effect repealed the Missouri Compromise because it allowed the settlers in these two areas to decide whether or not to allow slavery. Since these territories were located north Missouri, they gave southern slaveholders an opportunity that had been closed to them since 1820.


What did the Kansas Nebraska act gave voters in Kansas and Nebraska territories the right to do?

The Kansas-Nebraska Act, enacted in 1854, granted voters in the Kansas and Nebraska territories the right to decide whether to allow slavery within their borders through the principle of popular sovereignty. This meant that the settlers of each territory would determine the status of slavery, leading to significant conflict and violence, particularly in Kansas, which became known as "Bleeding Kansas." The act effectively repealed the Missouri Compromise, which had previously prohibited slavery in those territories.


What were three ways in which the civil war changed the nation?

slavery ended the north won and Lincoln gave a speech called the Gettysburg address's.


What did the Emancipation Proclamation do for the North?

Gave them the reassurance that Britain and France could no longer aid the South without looking pro-slavery themselves.


What were the three ways in which the civil war changed the nation?

slavery ended the north won and Lincoln gave a speech called the Gettysburg Address's.


How did the Kansas Nebraska act lead to growing hostility between pro-slavery and anti slavery supporters?

The Kansas-Nebraska Act gave voters in those territories to either have their states be free of slavery or allow it. Kansas had a long border with slave state Missouri. There were strong feelings on each side of the slavery issue. Lack of law enforcement and high tensions among the people cause terrible violence to occur.


How did the Compromise of 1850 satisfy the north and the south?

At the time of the Missouri Compromise, there was strong disagreement between people who were pro-slavery and those who were anti-slavery. Various territories, such as Missouri, Arkansas, and Maine, were trying to become states, but there was great concern over whether the new states would be slave states or free. The compromise mapped out which land would have slaves allowed, and which would not. In effect it gave pro-slave people the right to retain slaves and extend slavery to the west, and it gave the anti-slavery people a guarantee that slavery would not be extended into the Northwest.